European rightward turn and UN
Also from CFAM, a possible consequence of the (comparatively) rightward turn in Europe: European Rightward Tilt may Affect UN Business. Posted by Jim Kalb at June 02, 2002 08:54 AM | Send Comments
Much of this supposed turn to extremism doesn’t look like anything that would have bothered any number of modern European leaders from Disraeli down to De Gaulle. Once you look past the sensational personalities and media, the actual platforms look more like proposed reforms than planned revolutions. The problem is that all history has been defined as an ever-Leftward trail. Therefore, any serious right is the enemy of progress. And some of the enemies, like Pim Fortuyn, don’t need to be right-wing! Posted by: Jim Carver on June 3, 2002 1:32 PMIt’s a sort of hysteria that doesn’t go away. But “their theory of things” (which is more or less identical with what you call Liberalism) isn’t questioned by anybody, and certainly not by someone like Fortuyn (or even Heider). Aznar or Berlusconi are simply moderate liberals. Le Pen is a different sort of thing, but I really cannot take him seriously. What’s more, in Europe (which is the place I currently live in) media and academia are even more thoroughly liberal than in America. So any talk about “European rightward turn” is just pure nonsense. Posted by: Ar(t)isto on June 3, 2002 6:08 PMOh, I agree it’s rather rushing things. At present it’s the hysteria and inability to think or discuss anything that are most striking. Posted by: Jim Kalb on June 3, 2002 6:12 PMFrom our (European) perspective we could rather talk about “American rightward turn” (Bush as a president, resurgence of patriotism after 9/11, etc.) Of course, it doesn’t make any sense either. Posted by: Ar(t)isto on June 3, 2002 6:13 PM |