The fraud of “individualized, holistic” race preferences
An article by John Morley in the Daily Utah Chronicle marvelously captures the fraud that the University of Michigan Law School admissions office was engaged in an “individualized,” “holistic” consideration of each applicant even as it assured itself that it would arrive at the desired “critical mass” of blacks:
If the law school had truly examined applicants individually for diversity, it would have admitted people with interesting life experiences-like second languages or unique familial situations-at the same rate as minorities.Smoke, Mirrors and the Supreme Court Ruling The Myth Behind the Continuing Affirmative Action Debate in Schools By John Morley Daily Utah Chronicle [no date] Posted by Lawrence Auster at July 08, 2003 12:02 PM | Send Comments
Morley is pointing out the obvious in his article, but he is doing good service. The more often the truth about the race racket is spoken on campus, the better. Perhaps at Utah (one cannot be too sure of a state that produces Republicans like Orrin Hatch and Chris Cannon) Morley will not pay too high a price for telling the truth. Just imagine if he had written this in a student newspaper at Harvard - or Michigan. HRS Posted by: Howard Sutherland on July 8, 2003 1:34 PMIt was not all obvious to me. The point I italicized in the article made a connection I hadn’t made before, showing definitively that “individualized review” is a fraud. Posted by: Lawrence Auster on July 8, 2003 1:44 PM |