The final redoubt of European man?
John Hagan writes in an e-mail:
The most contiguous area in the Western Hemisphere with a European population is now Argentina, Chile, Urugray, and the Southern regions of Brazil. Is this the new “Anglosphere”? In 30 or 40 years is this where European civilization will make its stand? As far-fetched as it seems; I say yes. South America’s racial caste system is strict, and I see this region having the same demographics then, as it has today. Who would have “thunk” it 50 years ago??? Posted by Lawrence Auster at November 05, 2003 09:20 AM | Send Comments
Interesting idea, but there are some problems with it. While there are not huge Indian populations in the southern cone of South America, they do exist and there are ethnic pressure groups now claiming to speak in their name. Brazil has a huge black and large Indian population, and the Brazilian government seems determined to repeat all of America’s errors re affirmative action. As for an “Anglosphere,” while there was significant British settlement in parts of Argentina, the Southern Cone’s European culture is continental: Spanish (Portuguese in Brazil) with, in Argentina and Uruguay especially, very strong Italian elements and some German elements as well. The last consideration is that there is some degree of white flight already from these countries as their economies stagnate, Argentina being the most acute case. There has been a degree of returning to the mother country on the part of Argentines of Italian and Spanish ancestry, while anyone who spends time in New York and other big American cities can tell you there is no shortage of Argentines and Chileans in them now, legally and illegally swelling the ranks of “hispanics.” The better educated of them constitute a severe brain-drain from their homelands. The Southern Cone might be a place for a last stand of the Europeans, but the Europeans have to be persuaded to stay there long enough. HRS Posted by: Howard Sutherland on November 5, 2003 10:41 AMTeenagers growing up in Brazil and Argentina (I assume it’s the same for Uruguay) have the same postmodern culture as American teenagers: they watch the same movies, listen to the same music, read the same books/magazines (if they read at all), listen to leftist teachers and professors, watch the same TV shows, have the same values, hate to go to church, wear the same clothes, hear the same talk from politicians (Brazil’s government is leftist, anti-American), hate Bush, etc. Many of them may be racially white, but is this the group that’s going to grow up to take a last stand to save Western Civilization?? Or does their value to future generations reside solely in their whiteness? Posted by: Arie Raymond on November 5, 2003 4:03 PMI’ve been to Argentina four times and it doesn’t strike me as all that conservative. The province of Buenos Aires recently started to recognize “same sex” relationships. Television is as bad as it is here. I think the other provinces are a bit more conservative. This makes me ask the question - where is the counter revolution? Is there any country in the Western world that’s getting more conservative? Posted by: Steve Jackson on November 6, 2003 7:01 AM“Is there any country in the Western world that’s getting more conservative?” The answer - as you should know - is NO. Posted by: ironically european on November 6, 2003 11:29 AMof course, for some silly folks here - in europe - it is america which is getting still more and more conservative which is nonsense, as you know too well Posted by: ironically european on November 6, 2003 11:32 AM |