|
Race relations according to The Times
In the New York Times’ view of things, if you don’t want blacks to be granted unearned rewards on the basis of race, that means you never want blacks to be recognized or rewarded for anything. If you don’t support racial quotas for blacks, that means that you want the total exclusion of blacks from society. Posted by Lawrence Auster at November 25, 2003 11:07 AM | Send Comments
Our “Conservative” President feels the same way on this issue as the New York Times. Posted by: David on November 26, 2003 11:07 PMGood inclusion can’t really mean a forced inclusionism. Similarly, bad exclusion can’t really be people freely excluding you from what they must want to include you in, if it is to happen freely. Who,except the unworthy of acceptance, would demand to be included by those who don’t want them. Not everyone is morally equal, those who say otherwise class themselves as morally equal to pol pot or some big murderers. Diversity, as with inclusion of diversity as a value, is wrong. how can someone or something be better just by being different from the majority ( or thr dominant )? Yet this is what their diversity value-fiction is celebrating and trying to force on people, saying that there are helpless races that will be otherwise excluded unto death. More at the page below… Posted by: john s bolton on March 27, 2004 2:53 AM |