Philosopher says we must create meaning and goodness
Martha Nussbaum, the liberal political philosopher at Brown University who likes to combine hip, countercultural attitudes with classical philosophy (or rather who uses the latter to help advance the former), seems to have a spiritual younger sister, Susan Neiman, the director of the Einstein Forum, a liberal think tank in Potsdam, Germany. Bill Moyers recently interviewed Neiman on his tv show (just as he interviewed Nussbaum a few years ago), and I sent her this e-mail about it:
Dear Miss Neiman:By the way, Neiman’s book, Evil in Modern Thought, has been positively reviewed in many conservative journals, including First Things. My superficial impression of the conservatives’ reaction is that they are so happy to see a modern academic philosopher taking the problem of evil seriously, that they fail to grasp Neiman’s existentialism and relativism. Neiman assumes a world without truth, a world in which human beings naively believe in the existence of truth and goodness, but when some disaster like 9/11 happens, that belief is shattered. Her treatment seems to be based on the false assumption that if goodness and truth objectively exist, they must be perfectly manifested in everything that exists; if they’re not perfectly manifested, that proves they don’t exist. This is like saying that the proof of God’s existence is that God’s will must be perfectly fulfilled on earth, that nothing bad must ever happen on earth. This misconception, which is very common today, is the result of conflating the secular and the transcendent. A truer understanding is shown in the Lord’s Prayer: “Thy will be done on earth, as it is in heaven.” The petition implies that in the usual course of things, God’s will is not done on earth. It is up to us to turn toward God and ask that through his grace his will be done in and through our lives. The key Gospel passage on the meaning of misfortunes is at Luke 13:4-5, where Jesus speaks of the fall of the tower of Siloam that had killed many people, and tells his disciples: “Except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish.” What this means, as I understand it, is that unless you change and live a new life in God, your own death with be as random and meaningless as the death of the people who were crushed by that tower. The will of God is not the complete cessation of earthly disasters. The will of God is that we live in God and in harmony with God, whatever our external circumstances may be. The occurrence of great disasters and evil acts does not disprove the objective existence of God and goodness. This does not mean, of course, that prayer is not efficacious in delivering people from many earthly evils.
Zachary Crockett writes (January 29, 2008):
Your statement that “The occurrence of great disasters and evil acts does not disprove the objective existence of God and goodness” is perfectly coherent and logical. Likewise is the point in your letter to Susan Neiman that justice must exist for us to be able to make the world more just.LA replies:
I don’t think the analogy works. My position and Susan Neiman’s position are not analogous. Posted by Lawrence Auster at January 09, 2004 05:24 PM | Send Comments
Excellent short essay, Mr. Auster. It is disappointing to hear that many Conservatives have embraced this book. Their discernment has once again lapsed, it seems. Posted by: Paul Cella on January 10, 2004 11:11 AM |