Terrorism à l’outrance
Observing the start of a four-day Moslem holiday in the Kurdish part of Iraq, the leaders of the country’s two main Kurdish parties were greeting hundreds of supporters at their respective offices when two suicide bombers, dressed as Moslem clerics, simultaneously set off bombs killing 56 people and injuring hundreds. This is the first time that terrorists in Iraq—and they may well have been from the Al Qaeda-linked Ansar Al Islam group—have used explosives strapped to their bodies. These Wahhabi fanatics have made it clear that they are ready and willing to destroy all human life on earth that is not under their thumb.
Which raises the question. Was the United States too aggressive in conquering Iraq and thus setting off this hideous terrorist insurgency? Or have we been not nearly aggressive enough? Comments
It is a good question as to whether we have been to aggressive or not aggressive enough in Iraq. I leave with a quote: Insanity is the exception in individuals. In groups, parties, people, and times, it is the rule. “Insanity is the exception in individuals. In groups, parties, people, and times, it is the rule.” This is very interesting, and could be re-phrased as follows: People tend to be rational insofar as they are conducting their personal, family, and working lives. But insofar as they are functioning as followers of parties, movements, ideologies, they tend to be irrational. Posted by: Lawrence Auster on February 3, 2004 8:27 PMbartelson’s thoughts are similar to mine. I’ll only add that the U.S. also once knew how to deal effectively with insurrections, even Muslim ones. It did so quite effectively in the Philippines, specifically in Muslim Mindanao. Posted by: Paul C. on February 3, 2004 9:41 PM |