Election proves VFR view of liberalism
Since everyone on the right is interpreting the election results as a confirmation of his own pet theory or grand strategy, why can’t I do likewise? Let’s accept the premise that the election has been a historic defeat for the Democratic party, relegating to permanent loser status its reigning left-liberal ideology. Would the election not then signal—the apocalypse of liberalism?
(For further explanations of what I mean by this phrase, see this and this.) Comments
According to George Neumayr at American Spectator, the Dems themselves see their own distant or hostile attitude toward moral and religious concerns as a key to their defeat. But what would lead to, other than more transparently phony posturing such as Kerry telling us that religion is central to his life? http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=7353 Posted by: Lawrence Auster on November 5, 2004 9:14 AM |