Christians out, pedophiles in

(Note: To top off this story, be sure to see Ken Hechtman’s comment below.)

According to WorldNetDaily, pedophiles in the Netherlands are registering a pedophile political party, the aim of which is to reduce the the legal age of sexual relations from 16 to 12 and to legalize bestiality.

The first question that springs to mind is: will the Somali Dutch politician Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Robert Spencer’s hero, support the legal recognition of this pedophile party (that is, if she hasn’t come to America yet to take up her new perch at the American Enterprise Institute)? Well, why not? She champions every kind of life-style perversity, and seeks to exclude Christians and conservatives from politics. Remember that last year when a Dutch court prohibited the government from subsidizing a small Christian party opposed to abortion, euthanasia, and homosexual marriage, Ali, as reported in the Brussels Journal, supported the decision, “saying that any political party discriminating against women or homosexuals should be deprived of funding and, hence, effectively banned.”

- end of initial entry -

After Robert Spencer replied to him on the question of Hirsi Ali, James Harrison tried to post again at Jihad Watch but the thread was closed. (A comment I tried to post was blocked even while the thread was still open, so Spencer, who opened a new thread for the specific purpose of carrying on an attack against me, would not allow me to defend myself.) Mr. Harrison has sent his unposted comment to me and here it is:

Thanks for responding, Robert.

I’m not exactly sure as to how the race discussion or contention, along with your perceived misunderstandings, pertain to my post.

Now, about Ayaan Hirsi Ali: She has sought to ban Christian and conservative parties in Europe. Additionally, she has crusaded for women’s and homosexual rights. She has also equated immigration restrictionists with Nazis.

You can read more about Hirsi Ali, particularly her agenda that seeks to undermine the West, conservativism, traditionalism and the Christian religion, by clicking on the many links that Larry provided in the previous thread you made about him.

It seems very clear that Hirsi Ali wishes to dismantle religion altogether; and this includes both Islam and Christianity.—Certainly, Mr. Spencer, you see this as true, or at least moderately true, right?

Under normal circumstances, conservativism is closely tied with religion and shares a multitude of similarities; so if religion dissipates, just like Hirsi Ali wants, conservativism will dissipate as well.

You said that you value the Judeo-Christian West, along with our culture and people. Hirisi Ali, apparently, values us little; and her secularist ideas, along with her secularist advocations, clearly indicate that she wishes to dismantle us.

With this in mind, here are three questions:

How could an alliance with her bring us, the Jihadist resistance, any benefit?

If it could bring us a benefit, would the disadvantages outweigh, and therefore negate, the advantages?

If the Jihad is brought to an end, or at least minimized to the point of little significance, how will you regard, and what will you think of, Hirsi Ali and the threat of her secularism?

One last question: It appears that you’re ceaselessly painting Larry with a negative connotation in all of your posts; and I’m wondering: why?

Ken Hechtman writes:

The Dutch story is for real. Even WorldNetDaily couldn’t make that up.

Here’s a Montreal story I couldn’t make up:

Since a Supreme Court ruling in January of this year it has been legal to have group sex in Montreal bars. But starting tomorrow, if you light a cigarette afterwards you can get a $500 fine.

LA replies:

Mr. Hechtman gets the Samuel Francis Anarcho-Tyranny Spotting Award of the year. Also in this connection, see my article, “Why is liberalism both liberationist and totalitarian?”

Posted by Lawrence Auster at May 30, 2006 07:26 PM | Send