Sobran awakes!
Paul K. writes:
I find this positively weird. Joe Sobran, who only a few months ago couldn’t see what all the fuss was about regarding the massive influx of Mexicans, has just read Pat Buchanan’s book and declares himself alarmed. Has Joe Sobran been asleep for the past 20 years? Can he only process information if it is spoon-fed him by Buchanan? Will this sudden insight pass, and he once again observe that he couldn’t imagine Jesus turning Mexicans back at the border?LA replies:
Amazing. Sobran was a speaker at the 1994 American Renaissance conference, and, unlike every other speaker, he had nothing to say against our immigration policies and the racial/cultural transformation of America. He thought we could handle any ethnic problems by returning to our constitutional system, his all-purpose panacea. And from what I’ve heard, he has not had a word to say against immigration in the years since then. Yet now he suddenly discovers the immigration disaster and lauds Buchanan for “being right ahead of his time.” A reader writes:
I think you are wrong about Sobran not staying woken up. You are letting your pique at Sobran cloud your better judgment. It is almost inexcusable that he stayed asleep on immigration for 15 years. But the general rule is that once people wake up about immigration, they stay awake. Indeed they tend to become more militant over time, if anything. There is no reason to expect any more or less of Sobran.Michael Jose writes:
“…signing on with the Rothbardian anarcho-libertarians who deny the legitimacy of all government including national borders”LA replies:
“Actually, a large number of Rothbardians believe in national borders, and in reduced immigration, although they don’t believe it should be enforced by a state.”Gintas J. writes:
Sobran is not a stable heavyweight conservative. He did have usefulness for me in exposing Buckley as a droning bore (“In Search of anti-Semitism”). Before that I wondered if something was wrong with me in finding Buckley’s columns uninteresting. After that I knew there was something wrong with people who found Buckley’s columns interesting. Posted by Lawrence Auster at August 27, 2006 02:38 PM | Send Email entry |