Neocons have made the key concession that dooms their ideology
In an interview on the Journal Editorial Report hosted by Wall Street Journal editorial page editor Paul Gigot, Mark Steyn states clearly that Muslim immigrants—not radical Muslims, not Wahhabi Muslims, not a handful of Muslim clerics, but the mass of ordinary Muslim immigrants into the West—want and expect the Western countries that are receiving them to turn into Islamic countries. Then Gigot asks Steyn what we need to do to prevent this from happening. His answer is a prime example of the Steyn Disconnect:
GIGOT: … Why is this conflict, in your view, different [from the Cold War]?It’s bizarre beyond belief. Steyn plainly describes the mass importation of Muslims into the West as an existential threat to our civilization, yet he does not suggest—he does not even touch on the topic—that we stop this importation. Indeed, in part two of his recent interview with Michelle Malkin, Steyn seemed to say that he welcomes all legal immigrants who do not have a criminal record or terrorist pedigree, i.e., he favors the continued immigration of the same Muslim masses who he has said are seeking to Islamize the West. Still, Steyn’s exchange with Gigot definitely represent progress. Central to the neoconservative treatment of non-Western mass immigration has always been the axiom that the immigrants themselves do not pose a cultural threat; it is only factors extraneous to the immigrants themselves, such the multicultural ideology advocated by ethnic and leftist elites, that pose a cultural threat. But here Steyn is saying, and the open-borders commissar Paul Gigot does not challenge him, that Muslim immigrants pose a cultural threat. The neocons have thus made the key concession that dooms their open-borders ideology.
A reader comments:
Yes, there is nothing from Gigot comparable to Wattenberg, who, when a guest on his show pointed out the Mexican atavism about reconquering the Southwest, said something like, “Do you think the average Hispanic maid working in a Los Angeles hotel is thinking that way?” In other words, it’s just the eruptions of a tiny elite and has no relation to the mass of immigrants. But here, Gigot doesn’t answer Steyn in that way because, one, Steyn has more or less said that it is just the average Muslim who thinks the West will adapt to him rather than vice versa; two, Gigot probably realizes that as well, and can’t muster up the energy to say, “But do you really think the average Muslim carpet distributor from Pakistan wants the West to become Muslim territory?”; and, three, Gigot is afraid to ask the question because—and here we come full circle—Steyn will say, YES, IN FACT I JUST SAID THAT. Posted by Lawrence Auster at October 30, 2006 02:17 PM | Send Email entry |