Gotta Serve Somebody
The central mission of the blog Powerline over the last few years has been the defense of President George W. Bush. While this is not an inherently dishonorable task, it is not exactly an elevating one either. Indeed, it makes sycophancy almost inevitable, a fact that is coming more to the fore now that the race to succeed Bush is on in earnest, and Powerline is looking for a new leader to serve. That leader is Rudolph Giuliani, as is evident from this embarrassing blog entry:
HE’S GOODFrom all the praise, you would think that Rudy had skillfully parried brutally tough questioning from a hostile reporter. In fact, the interview was with Republican apparatchik Hugh Hewitt, who has been a Giuliani promoter for years and who fed him easy questions (as is also pointed out by the commenter Hitman at the Hewitt site). Yet Paul and John fall all over themselves at the wonders of Giuliani’s great performance: First, the title of the entry: “HE’S GOOD.” Then the repetition of the same phrase in the text of the entry, and in its own paragraph: “He’s good.” Then John chimes in saying, “Rudy is indeed very, very good.” These guys should have been courtiers at Versailles, trying to outdo each other in their fragrant compliments to the King.
Brian B. writes:
Can anyone forget this classic suckup at Powerline?Alec H. writes:
I.e. they are “ronin” (masterless samurai).LA writes:
There’s an impression I may have helped create above that I don’t agree with. To describe John and Paul as courtiers, or as “suck-ups,” implies that they are praising Bush and Giuliani because they seek advancement. I don’t think that’s it at all. I think they are acting out of a sincere desire to identify with and support a leader, for reasons they think of as wholly patriotic. But in their case this natural and legitimate desire is carried to excess.LA writes:
By the way, the title of this entry, “Gotta Serve Somebody,” comes from the title of a 1979 Bob Dylan song which was the first song in his first Christian album. I’m obviously using the phrase in a different sense here. Posted by Lawrence Auster at February 24, 2007 01:01 PM | Send Email entry |