The Libby conviction
Concerning the conviction of Lewis Libby today, Larry G. writes:
Thirty-three years ago I watched with my father as President Nixon resigned the presidency after essentially being hounded out of office by the press. After the speech was over, my father turned to me and said, “Well, we live in a banana republic now.” With all the wisdom of my 18 years, I disagreed. But I long ago concluded that my father was right.LA replies:
While I don’t agree with Larry G. about Nixon’s resignation, I agree with everything else he says. When has anyone been tried and found guilty of the crime of perjury and sentenced to jail merely for making misstatements to investigators concerning a non-existent crime? Oh, yes. In the Martha Stewart case (discussed by me here and here). But this is far worse, since, as we know, the supposed administration vendetta against Joseph Wilson and Valerie Plame which was the original object of this investigation and which supposedly motivated Libby’s supposed leak never occurred, and Fitzgerald knew this three years ago. An evil thing has been done here. The left had to “get” someone in the administration, and now they’ve done it. Fitzgerald is an evil man who deserves to go to hell for what he’s done. David H. writes:
When I read your statement about the Lewis Libby trial, especially “…Fitzgerald is an evil man who deserves to go to hell for what he’s done…”, it reminded me of a time long ago when moral pronunciations like yours were the norm, not a condemned, marginalized, perhaps soon-to-be-outlawed exception. How I thank you for taking me to that long-lost time…Peter A. writes:
The moment I began to feel like we’re living in a banana republic: when the two Rodney King cops were retried following their first acquittal.LA writes:
I’m trying to remember the first time I felt we were living in a banana republic…. It’ll come to me…David H. writes:
Apropos, I agree with Peter A., The Rodney King trial, and also the aftermath—when neither the Army nor the National Guard was sent to suppress flagrant acts of murder and vandalism (actual racist ones), that was the exact moment when I realized how bad it had gotten. There was a time when a shoot-to-kill order would have been issued and the barbarity would have come to a screeching halt, but that time has been relegated to picture books of events like the San Francisco earthquake.Jay F. writes:
While I agree with your characterization of Fitzgerald and his prosecution, I have no sympathy for Libby. He forgot the first traditional value all of us should have been taught as children: “Tell the truth.” The circumstances do not matter. The questioner and his motives do not matter. Just tell the truth.LA replies:
Do you have any insights into why Libby would have misstated?Jay F. replies:
While I do not claim to know what was specifically on Libby’s mind or the minds of his attorneys and advisers, I can comment on the general culture of politics.Howard Sutherland writes:
I see you have a good comment up about Libby. This is more about mainstream conservative reaction to Libby contrasted to the reaction to Ramos-Compean than about the merits of Libby’s case, but I still think the difference in treatment is noteworthy.Paul Henri replies to my earlier reply to him: Lawrence, you hit your correspondents hard, and we should thank you for it. I must admit I think the word is highly offensive to homosexuals, and I was uncomfortable with her using the word in a serious political conference. Still conservatives should make the establishment curses just as offensive as faggot. One way of doing this is to take it up a notch, which will require the media to discuss the relative offensiveness of establishment curses. Ann is one of the few people doing this. She is an iconoclast of liberal ideals. Conservatives have been playing goody two-shoes politics for too long, and it is time to play hard ball. Posted by Lawrence Auster at March 06, 2007 03:37 PM | Send Email entry |