Does the war sink Rudy’s chances?
Bobby writes:
I fear you are missing the main reason not to nominate Giuliani as the Republican presidential candidate: he is totally unelectable. Giuliani is a gigantic supporter of the Iraq debacle. If Bush can only manage a pitiful 30% approval rating for this war, how can anyone say with a straight face that Giuliani has even a modicum of a chance at ever winning the general election? He will not motivate the conservative base so much as he will repulse it, he will not bring over moderates or liberals since the Democratic machine will showcase his support of Bush and Iraq. There is simply no way Giuliani can win. That is the most effective argument you can make, even more than his disgraceful morality, in getting people to think critically about what a dismal failure his candidacy, or for that matter even a McCain candidacy, would turn out to be. They both would be tied to the utterly hated Bush administration and dragged into the electoral abyss.LA replies:
But according to his promoters (e.g. Barbara Lerner in yesterday’s NRO), the very reason conservatives support Giuliani is that they see him as not like Bush, but as Bush Plus—that is, believing in the WOWYWTCI (the war on whatever you want to call it), but having an aggression and follow through that Bush lacks. So they don’t see him as the mere continuation of Bush, but as more effective replacement for Bush. Posted by Lawrence Auster at March 20, 2007 05:55 PM | Send Email entry |