Darn!
Just as Dan Balz in the Washington Post the other day made it clear that he regarded the absence of a pre-ordained result in the Republican primaries to be a disturbing departure from the way things ought to be, the New York Times makes it clear that it is unhappy that military prosecutors will be unable to prove a My Lai-type massacre by U.S. Marines in Haditha, Iraq:
The Erosion of a Murder Case Against Marines in the Killing of 24 Iraqi Civilians“May well have ended prosecutors’ chances of winning any murder convictions.” This is the kind of language that the Times uses when someone it sympathizes with is prevented by unfortunate circumstances from realizing his dreams, e.g., “Poor third-round finish in British Open ends Tiger Woods’s chances of winning Grand Slam this year.” The implication is that the prosecutors through the tough breaks of life were deprived of something that, under more favorable conditions, they would have rightfully had—proof that the American involvement in Iraq is defined by the mass murder of Iraqis by U.S. servicemen. Email entry |