Obamandias
What’s the truth of what’s happening? The epiphany of Obamamessiah, the semi-divine love object of 80,000 transported souls filling the stadium? Or a vacant fantasy, a vain, empty mummery, the hollow pretentiousness of which is already making it collapse from within?
And on the pedestal these words appear:(Sent by John O., apres Shelley’s “Ozymandias”)
The after-effect? It’s like any other Obama speech. It’s flashy, and effective, he has great delivery and looks good (that was a great tie), his family looked nice (Michelle wore a much more becoming dress than on Monday night), he looks like a winner, like someone with special qualities and confidence, you can see him becoming president (however that makes you feel), but afterwards … nothing remains. It was a hollow entertainment—not even satisfying as entertainment. What is Obama about? He doesn’t seem to be about black liberation theology, or leftism, or redistributionism, or any of that stuff. He just seems to be about the presentation of himself. His message is—himself. He is the One we’ve been waiting for. But since his self doesn’t point to anything beyond itself, his message is a nullity.
A reader writes to the Corner:
It is with great humility that I accept this nomination at a temple in front of 80,000 with fireworks blasting overhead.August 29 Kidist Paulos Asrat writes:
I agree that Obama looked quite dignified yesterday. He didn’t have that strange pattern where he pauses in unlikely places losing the rhythm of his speech. And he did have a certain gravitas and passion which was presidential. I actually wasn’t listening, only watching for visual cues.Kidist writes:
I do agree with your points. But I did say that Obama wasn’t Hitler, but Hitler-like. I think he was just too impatient. What he did so far, amassing an adulating audience, and, as his campaign shows, very bright people who will do his bidding, was a start. He went for the gold too soon. [LA replies: Hitler was 43 when he took power in Germany, but again, he had spent the previous ten years as the leader of a movement aimed at taking power in Germany.] Hitler also depended on smart people around him, and had those strange mesmerizing (to some) oratory skills, although I will say he was probably smarter than Obama and more “evil” if one can call Obama evil. But either through design or through circumstance, Hitler built his “credentials” up before presenting himself as the country’s leader. Posted by Lawrence Auster at August 28, 2008 10:34 PM | Send Email entry |