The conservatives’ undisguised intellectual cowardice
In the four or so days since Sarah Palin’s barely-keeping-her-head-above-water interview with Katie Couric, there have been only two, reluctant, non-substantive references to it at the Corner. Two days ago, Kathryn Jean Lopez mentioned it—but only in defensive response to a reader who had pointed out that that the Corner had been completely silent about it. And yesterday Peter Robinson wrote this:
When Sarah Met Katie [Peter Robinson]What a perfect expression of the chestless “conservatives” who inhabit NRO! Robinson, without embarrassment, states that he doesn’t want to see a Palin interview in which Palin did not do well. He publicly admits that he doesn’t want to know an unpleasant truth. What a man! What an American! Meanwhile, over at Powerline, that website that follows like a bloodhound every twist and turn in the campaign, that is constantly on the lookout for any unfair statement about McCain or Bush, no matter how deeply buried it may be in the back pages of the Washington Post, there is no mention of the Palin interview. The Powerline guys don’t care how it makes them look that they ignore a significant story that is tough for their side. They don’t care that it makes them look like intellectual cowards. What ought they to have done? At least grapple with it. At least acknowledge that this was not a great performance by Palin. They could have said something like, they’re not happy with it, but she’s a newbie on the national stage and she will steadily grow more assured. Their refusal even to say that much suggests that they themselves don’t believe it. So they’ve hunkered down, hoping that no one notices how unimpressive their VP candidate was.
Email entry |