Blankley: Obama doesn’t like America
Tony Blankley writes at the Washington Times:
If President Obama were to try to misrepresent his positions for the next four years, there would be nothing he could say that would approach the inaccuracy of his claim last week that he is not for big government. It is the essence of the man and his presidency. He doesn’t like America the way it has been since its founding—and it will take an abusively big government to realize his dreams of converting America into something quite different. If you don’t know that, you don’t yet know Barack Obama.I agree with Blankley’s comment about Obama. But did Blankley ever say that George W. Bush didn’t like America the way it had been since its founding, and that he wanted to use open borders to realize his dream of converting America into something quite different? Did Blankley ever criticize Bush for sending his idiot Secretary of State and close personal pal around the world bad-mouthing America before bewildered foreign audiences? Did he ever call Bush an anti-American for going to Africa in 2003 and declaring that “the racial bigotry fed by slavery” still characterizes America today? (Read about it here.) I challenge Blankley to find a single affectionate thing Bush ever said about our actual historical nation, apart from praising the military or speaking of the U.S. as God’s (unworthy) instrument for the spreading of universal democracy. Until conservative opinion makers render unto Bush the censures he richly deserves, especially for the same things for which they now excoriate Obama, their criticisms of Obama will have the stink of rank partisanship.
Sage McLaughlin writes:
You comment that, “Until conservative opinion makers render unto Bush the censures he richly deserves, especially for the same things for which they now excoriate Obama, their criticisms of Obama will have the stink of rank partisanship..”LA writes:
By the way, Tony Blankley is no longer the editorial page editor of the Washington Times. He is vice president of the Edelman public relations firm in Washington. This is from the company’s “Diversity” page:March 4 Paul Gottfried writes:
Congratulations on your ability to read my mind perfectly!LL writes:
I find it interesting that Blankley’s company uses that sanctimonious claptrap about diversity “simply being the right thing to do.” Another PR/advertising company of my acquaintance used the exact same phrasing when announcing a recent diversity initiative. One can only suppose that that is the approved language supplied by the Ministry of Truth.LA replies:
The phrase, “simply the right thing to do,” means it’s beyond discussion. Liberalism cannot defend its positions logically, so it must simply assert them as “simply the right thing to do,” i.e, as something that all good people automatically understand without further discussion. Modern liberalism rules, not by rational discourse and persuasion, but by collectivist consensus.Glynn Custred writes:
You forgot Bush’s single-minded effort to keep the borders open by refusing to enforce immigration laws and properly managing the border, to the extent of prosecuting US law enforcement officers, who attempted to so, at the behest of foreign governments. Posted by Lawrence Auster at March 03, 2009 09:20 AM | Send Email entry |