Is Madoff the emblematic man of our society?
Terry Morris writes:
I have a question for your more economically astute readers: Leonard D. writes:
The U.S. economic system does not “basically [work] on the same principles” as a Ponzi scheme. No (legal) part of it does. At worst, we have things like social security, which make promises of future payout that are implausibly large, so long as you assume continued low inflation. However, the U.S. government controls the dollar supply, and there’s very good reason to expect that it will prefer to print money rather than default on debt.Mark A. writes:
Having formerly worked in the investment field, I can offer a certain perspective on Madoff. Pensions plans started disappearing rapidly in the 1980s and 1990s. The interest on your bank account deposit is largely controlled by the Federal Reserve. After Volker was replaced by Greenspan at the Fed, interest rates were pushed down. In 1998, Phil Gramm and President Clinton repealed Glass Steagall. Interest rates are kept near one or two percent. Guess where you have to put your money? The stock market of course (if you want any return on your investment.) No more nine percent interest on your bank deposits like 1985. Fund managers make their money by charging a fee on how many assets they manage. The entire country got in the act. Pouring more and more of their paychecks in the stock market. This explained a lot of the increase in the SP500 in the 1990s. I used to peruse company financials back in the 1990s—they were making money on their financial holdings, not out of operations. The whole thing was sort of a ponzi scheme. Posted by Lawrence Auster at March 12, 2009 01:28 PM | Send Email entry |