national and civilizational terms, Rene Servoise, former French ambassador to Indonesia,
of the existential threat posed to France by its growing Moslem population. The article is as strong as anything that’s been written on the subject. Tiberge
. (Tiberge has rendered the entire article in italics; I’ve changed it to regular type.)
FRANCE AND THE REVIVAL OF ISLAM
(La France et le Renouveau de l’Islam)
by Rene Servoise
A mutation of our nation is in progress. It is growing, it is profound but uncontrolled. In all likelihood, the immense majority of Frenchmen are unaware of it.
Hundreds of thousands of Muslim families, from North Africa, the Middle East and black Africa—whose religion, aspirations and mores are radically different from ours—now live on our soil. Their birth rate is higher than that of European families. What is the consequence? Within 30 years the population of Islamist culture could be in the majority among those 40 years old or younger. “In France, we will have between 6 and 8 million Arabs by the years 2005-2010,” said Edgar Pisani, honorary president of the Arab World Institute. We have been duly warned: this is a radical transformation (political, economic, cultural and social) of our society.
This mutation is in progress at the very moment when, to use Toynbee’s expression, “an external proletariat” is forming on the southern and Western shores of the Mediterranean Sea. This army of reservists came about as a result of the birth rate of these peoples, and the absence of an economic policy capable of guaranteeing them a decent life in their homeland. In front of them lie France, Italy, Spain and Germany, lands of mirage, highly developed, with guaranteed employment, free social protection and education. Who could resist the call of this “promised land”?
At the same time, all over the world, roused by immense hopes, Islam is enjoying an unprecedented revival. It is awakening after a long night. It has renewed vigor, pugnacity and ambitions. From Morocco to Indonesia, from the Muslim States of Central Asia to black Africa, more than one billion two hundred million men—young compared to the aging populations of Europe—constitute a “community” (Umma).
It is transnational, motivated by spiritual aspirations, material demands and political ambitions, and (here and there) financed by revenue from oil.
In France, the successive waves of Italians, Poles, central European Jews, Spaniards and Portuguese, had never posed comparable problems of integration. Why? Because they belonged to the European branch. Their religious traditions and their ambition to acquire more individual freedoms facilitated their assimilation. Finally—and this is far from the least important reason—these immigrants expressed a desire to share the destiny of the French nation. To meld into it. Integration cannot be decreed. In order for it to materialize it must be desired by two, this is obvious. And the two must converge. Today, the situation is different, radically different. An active and determined minority among the Islamists refuses integration. Deliberately.
In close communion with Islam (its matrix), it is receptive to orders from abroad, to spiritual counsel, ideology and financial support. And much more. Not only does it intend to keep its identity, but to re-Islamize the non-practicing, if not convert the natives of the host country to the true faith. Islam has never conceived of itself as a minority in a secular State, but necessarily as the majority religion. ( … ) Exalted by its renewal, propelled both by its demography and its absence of economic development, infiltrating wherever there is no resistance, Islam is advancing like a wave.
The French people can measure its vitality by the number of mosques multiplying on their territory (sometimes with the help of Catholic and lay leaders), mosques run by imams 96 percent of whom are from foreign countries. Also by the prospect of seeing—in the second half of the 21st century—the fall of Catholicism in France to second rank, leaving first place to Islam.
Thus two dynamics are developing: one inside our borders ( … ); the other outside ( … ) Concomitant and convergent, these changes are determining factors for Europe and for the French nation where the demographic stagnation is alarming.
[Tiberge notes: This map below shows the growth of mosques, with the dark green areas indicating more than 30 mosques. The years range from 1985 to 2008. Their growth is amazing.]
Every nation expresses itself through a subtle, delicate and secret balance between dreams, ambitions and strengths, sometimes contradictory, transcended by a common aspiration to live together and to do great things together. This national identity is for some its soul; for others its genius. Each nation is a plant nourished by a land and a History, pride in its past. “Immediate to the heart of God,” it is unique and therefore justified.
How many centuries, wars, concessions, sacrifices and omissions were necessary for France, England, Spain and Germany to overcome—finally—their internal divisions and to become what they are!
If it is fitting—as Montesquieu recommends—to touch institutions only with a trembling hand, what can one say about the respect due the profound harmony of our nation, its internal composition—the measure of its permanence and of its performance?
To the lessons drawn from our past, the present adds new warnings about the future on a daily basis. How can we allow ourselves to be blinded to the point of not seeing the proliferation and the exasperation of ethnic and religious conflicts all around us, since the same causes produce the same effects?
[Tiberge notes: He then lists some of the numerous ethnic conflicts in the world, including those in Asia, Africa and Europe.]
Are we Frenchmen, after having overcome so many rebellions, insurrections and revolutions, after having liquidated our quarrels between Catholics, Protestants, Israelites and Free Thinkers; between nobles, bourgeois and proletariat, about to allow conditions that foster disintegration to take hold?
Warning. If native Frenchmen fail to be the most numerous, we will see that our days are numbered. If we fail to limit the number of immigrants, we will be judged as wanting in the scales of History. If we fail to affirm our national ambition, we will set the stage for the bursting apart of our nation.
Remember. One day, in Babylon, on the wall of his palace, Belshazzar saw letters written in fire, three warnings: MENE MENE, TEKEL, PARSIN. The prophet Daniel translated them thus:
God has numbered the days of your kingdom and brought it to an end.
You have been weighed on the scales and found wanting.
Your kingdom is divided and given to the Medes and the Persians.
For us today the warnings come daily on our TV screens. But no prophet dares translate them.
What kind of France, dear reader, do you hope to bequeath to your children?
[end of article.]
He is clearly drawing on and paraphrasing the 19th century historian Ernest Renan’s essay “What is a Nation?”
Servoise says that the French must “limit [i.e. reduce] the number of [Muslim] immigrants.” Beyond that he doesn’t suggest how the Islamic expansion in France can be halted and reversed. To me there is only one answer. The French people, represented by true French leaders who have the support of the people, must make a conscious decision that they want a country free of Islamic influence. Once they reach that decision, the means to make it happen, or at least to move in that direction, rather than steadily drifting toward greater and greater Islamization, will suggest themselves. But first the French must determine that
