Etan Patz, disappeared May 1979

Here are three questions I have for readers of this article. First, do you think it is correct, as suggested by Ginger Otis of the Post, that prior to Etan Patz’s disappearance New York City parents sllowed six year old children to walk unaccompanied on city streets, even if only to a bus stop a block or two away? Second, if you followed the Patz story at the time, were you aware that Mrs. Patz had allowed Etan to walk alone to the bus stop and that that was the way he disappeared? Third, if you followed the story, did you hear at the time about Jose Ramos who was an obvious suspect yet was twice released without explanation?

The other day the New York Post had a long article on the now 30-year-old disappearance of Etan Patz. The article is worth reading, and I’ve copied the whole thing below, followed by an e-mail I wrote to the author with some questions about the article (which, of course, she has not answered).

CHILDHOOD’S END
THE KIDNAPPING OF ETAN PATZ CHANGED WHAT IT MEANS TO BE A KID—AND A PARENT—IN NEW YORK CITY
By GINGER ADAMS OTIS
May 2, 2009

Thirty years ago this month, six-year-old Etan Patz ran down the three flights from his SoHo loft, kissed his mother goodbye, dashed out his front door to head west on Prince Street, vanished somewhere on the next block as he approached West Broadway, and changed New York City forever.

That day—May 25, 1979—was tow-headed Etan’s first solo walk to the school bus stop on the corner. When he didn’t return, the sleepy city, emptying ahead of the Memorial Day weekend, jolted awake.

Police fanned out in a massive hunt through lower Manhattan, tearing through basements and sewers and closets of family friends.

As news of a possible child abduction spread from the close-knit artist community of SoHo through the city, it also put an end to a way of life—one that allowed kids to run to corner stores, play unsupervised in neighborhood parks and dart around streetlamps and stoops for untended nighttime games of hide-and-seek and stickball.

Etan Patz was a child of a different city—the looser, bohemian Manhattan that today’s residents often regard with misty-eyed nostalgia. But that Manhattan also had frightening pockets of human depravity. Police, unequipped with computers, high-tech radios and quickly updated central databases, relied on beat smarts and word of mouth to investigate crimes—and all too often were defeated by the chaos within their own overworked system.

It was into that dark city that Etan Patz disappeared.

*

Ramshackle 1970s SoHo was a perfect fit for Stan and Julie Patz. The young couple, married in 1965, scraped together $7,500 for an empty shell of a loft and gradually renovated it for their growing family, adding plumbing, floors and walls.

In their airy haven was space for Stan, 37, a commercial photographer, to carve out a personal photography studio, which Julie, 36, also used to run a day-care center for toddlers.

Their kids, Shira 8, Etan, 6, and Ari, 2, went to local schools. Their neighbors were of a similar pioneering mindset, fashioning homes out of abandoned industrial buildings.

Nine weeks after her son vanished, Julie would relive the experience of Etan’s abduction with an NYPD hypnotist, according to a new book out this week by journalist Lisa R. Cohen. “After Etan” (Grand Central Publishing) opens with Julie’s recovered memories of her last moments with her son.

That day, Julie woke around 7 a.m. and prepared for a busy morning. As always, self-sufficient Etan dressed himself, donning blue pants, a T-shirt and sneakers, light blue ones with fluorescent green racing stripes up the sides. He threw on his favorite hat—a Future Flight Captain’s pilot cap from Eastern Airlines—and padded into the kitchen to eat his cereal.

Stan and Julie had been debating if it was time to let Etan walk to the bus stop unaccompanied—a privilege he’d been begging for all year, Cohen writes.

Now, this day, Etan was to make the trek alone, and he raced to the front door ahead of his mom. He was too short to reach the lock, and had to wait for Julie to turn it before he could head outdoors.

“I’m kissing him and I give him a hug. I say so long, tell him to have a good day. I watched him for a little while, and I went in the door and flipped the lock and closed it. I ran upstairs,” Julie says, according to a transcript of the hypnosis session obtained by Cohen.

Revealed in the session is an important detail: With two-year-old Ari upstairs with a toddler friend, and a crew of her day-care charges expected any moment, Julie didn’t—as she initially told police—return to the apartment and then step onto the front fire escape that has a view of Prince Street to watch her son reach West Broadway and turn the corner.

“Her mind had played a trick on her. Perhaps her unconscious had wanted her to have gone out on the balcony so badly, it had given her a false memory,” Cohen writes.

In reality, Julie had gotten on with her busy day almost immediately—and nobody knows for sure the precise path taken by Etan that drizzly May morning.

By 3:30 that afternoon, Julie was starting to feel the first prickles of panic.

She called neighbor Karen Altman. “Is Etan over there with you?”

Altman turned to her daughter Chelsea, who was in the same class, to ask her if she’d seen her friend after school.

The answer, Cohen writes, filled Julie with dread.

“Etan wasn’t in school today,” said the little girl.

Within hours, NYPD cops and detectives had descended en masse on the Patz’s loft—and soon would commandeer it as their communications center.

A team of investigators, led by detective Bill Butler, scrutinized Stan’s commercial photos and asked repeated, insistent questions about relatives and friends who could be harboring personal vendettas. Police dogs sniffed pieces of Etan’s clothes, but were unable to pick up his trail beyond West Broadway.

Neighbors and friends launched their own frantic searches, and Stan churned out prints of his elfin son’s face for cops to use on missing persons posters that show Etan smiling widely under a thick mop of blond hair, alongside the words “Lost Child Etan Patz.”

Even those without strong ties to the Patz family pitched in. Not far from the Patz loft, Sandy Harmon, a young single mother hired by Julie to walk her kids home from school during a recent bus strike, watched the evening news report on Etan’s disappearance, Cohen writes. Her boyfriend, Michael, stood up and headed for the door.

“Where are you going?” Sandy asked.

“Out to help look for that little boy,” Michael answered.

*

Days became weeks. A local Jamaican super who regularly shared jokes and greetings with Etan fell under suspicion because he worked out of a building that housed the city’s first gay erotic art gallery. At one point, investigators zeroed in on an art installation around the corner from Etan’s loft. The custodian of his building was a convicted pedophile, cops learned, and had made remarks suggesting Etan’s body was buried inside the 280,000 pounds of dirt in the “Earth Room” still on display in SoHo today. But an FBI sweep came up clean.

The leads were fruitless and, one by one, the detectives were reassigned. Friends gave up their searches, and Stan and Julie were left to piece together their fractured family.

Then, a few years later, police finally caught a break: They stumbled across the “drainpipe man.”

In March 1982, a long-haired drifter with a striking resemblance to Charles Manson was discovered living inside a muddy drainpipe in The Bronx. Among his sodden belongings were pictures of small boys, some blond, and one that looked like Etan.

The drainpipe man was hauled in for questioning. The vagrant, whose name is Jose Ramos, denied knowing Etan. Cops Cops asked Stan and Julie to review the pictures found in his lair. The couple was devastated—and simultaneously relieved—to find their son’s photo was not among them.

But cops found there were things about Ramos that didn’t add up.

For one, he sometimes went by the name Michael and—under interrogation—admitted to dating Sandy Harmon, the same Sandy who had sometimes walked Etan and other neighborhood children to school in 1979.

It was “Michael” who had watched the evening news with Sandy the day Etan vanished, and abruptly decided to look for the missing boy.

Detectives were skeptical. Were these the actions of a guilty man running to hide something before police found it? Or the selfless act of caring neighbor, as Ramos claimed?

The NYPD pushed for a stronger tie between Ramos and Etan, but turned up nothing. The drifter was allowed to go.

Stan and Julie asked to be allowed to see the children’s toys that had been collected from Ramos’s drainpipe hideout—they would recognize Etan’s playthings, they argued. But the cops refused, afraid to give the parents false hope.

The couple wondered why police didn’t contact Sandy Harmon, Cohen writes. They wondered who was keeping track of Ramos—had he just disappeared, like Etan, into the darkness of the city?

*

In fact, for several months after his arrest, Ramos lived within 10 blocks of the Patz family, Cohen later discovered.

After cops released him, Ramos went to a storage facility he had in Brooklyn, emptied it of his belongings, and moved into an empty store space in the West Village.

He might have stayed lost forever, if his own perverse needs hadn’t driven him to the Crossroads of the World, then a nexus of sex shows, strip clubs, drug addiction and prostitution. And Times Square had a special corner—known as Playland—set aside for pedophiles.

It was there, on a hot August night in 1982, that a newly-transferred vice cop named Joe Gelfand grabbed the drainpipe man for a second time, five months after Ramos was first collared. Caught in the act of soliciting sex from three male minors, Ramos was back in police custody.

Gelfand remembered that Ramos had a possible connection to Etan Patz and contacted NYPD detectives to let them know he had the drainpipe man.

A young city lawyer put Ramos in Rikers Island on a psych evaluation, and he spent several months under jailed observation. After Ramos was given a clean bill of mental health, however, prosecutors dismissed his case instead of charging him with a sex crime—and all without consulting Gelfand.

Vice detectives later explained to an enraged Gelfand that “The Manhattan [district attorney’s] sex crimes unit didn’t like pedophilia cases,” Cohen writes.

Ramos disappeared once again.

Five years passed before something changed in Etan’s case. An aggressive new US attorney—known for blasting Pavarotti arias from his office every morning and pursuing indictments with a reformer’s zeal—had taken over.

Rudy Giuliani, already gunning for the seedy Times Square businesses he’d later wipe out as mayor, wanted to crack the seemingly impenetrable, high-profile mystery. One of his best assistant US Attorneys was on the case: Stuart GraBois. A native New Yorker, GraBois grew up hearing about “L’Affaire Dreyfus” from his Jewish immigrant grandfather. He’d gotten his start in Legal Aid, moving to the US attorneys office in 1982.

Giuliani encouraged GraBois to reopen every possible avenue that might lead to Etan and fought for money and manpower so his assistant could track down even the most farfetched leads. Giuliani signed off on a trip to Israel for GraBois, after a rumor surfaced that a rabbi uncle kidnapped Etan and took him there.

He let GraBois use the US attorney’s clout with the mob to get help from Matty “The Horse” Ianniello, who controlled several bars along Prince Street where Etan vanished.

But even with GraBois’ work, several more years passed with no discernible progress, with investigators resorting to a psychic who led police on a wintery chase down to the East River.

After nearly three years of re-investigating old NYPD evidence, GraBois made a decision: It was time to look into the drainpipe man again.

This time, luck was on the prosecutor’s side. A few years earlier, Ramos had been arrested for preying on young boys within a traveling hippie group known as the Rainbow Family of Living Light. He was in Rockview prison in Pennsylvania, doing time on a child molestation conviction.

GraBois arranged to have Ramos transported to his Manhattan office in Federal Plaza on June 28, 1988.

Ramos was handcuffed to a heavy chair in GraBois’ office. The suspect appeared excited to be back in New York City and at times answered questions in a sing-songy Jackie Mason-esque Jewish accent. Ramos initially thought he’d been called into talk about taxes—he never paid them—because in his earlier interrogations with police he’d revealed that he made money by selling garbage he collected from the streets.

GraBois let him think that, encouraging Ramos to talk about his salvage business and his life on the streets. Then GraBois picked up a piece of paper and pretended to be looking at it carefully.

“How many times did you try to have sex with Etan Patz?” he demanded.

Ramos went white.

“Don’t lie to me, Jose.”

Ramos started to talk about a small blond-haired boy he’d picked up in Washington Square Park the day Etan went missing. “We talked a little, and then I asked him if he wanted to go back to my apartment,” Ramos said.

“Why would you bring [Etan] back to your apartment?” GraBois demanded.

“For sex,” Ramos replied.

GraBois was convinced he had Etan’s killer, but Ramos, terrified, stopped cooperating. Ramos spun a convoluted tale about putting the child, unharmed, on a subway to Washington Heights. He refused to admit to more.

But on their way to the elevators to transport Ramos back to Rockview, the inmate teased GraBois about the blockbuster revelations to come in New York’s most famous missing-person case.

“You’ll be famous. You’ll have Giuliani’s job,” Ramos said.

Seconds later, the elevator doors opened to reveal Giuliani himself inside. “Mr. Giuliani!” Ramos hailed him. “I seen you on TV. The camera makes you look heavier.”

Giuliani, who didn’t recognize the suspect, shot GraBois a look that said, “Who is this guy?” Cohen writes.

*

Since that day in 1988, GraBois has tried to wring a full confession from Ramos—with limited success. GraBois even set up elaborate jailhouse stings with snitches. Without a new indictment, Ramos will be up for parole in Pennsylvania in three years. Originally scheduled for parole in 2014, in the last month Ramos has gotten his sentence recalibrated, and could now be back on the streets by 2012, Cohen has discovered.

Ramos has unwittingly dropped several incriminating details—including a likely scenario for what happened to six-year-old Etan’s body. According to author Cohen, New York investigators suspect that Ramos burned Etan’s remains—probably in the basement boiler at the East Fourth Street slum where he had an apartment in 1979. But none of the findings have been enough for Manhattan District Attorney Robert Morgenthau—who has refused to convene a grand jury.

To prevent Ramos from trying to profit from his “If I did it” confessions, Stan Patz had his son declared legally dead in 2001. Three years later, a judge ruled in civil court that Ramos was legally responsible for Etan’s death.

Stan and Julie have pushed initiatives to help missing children, including helping to create a centralized database of their cases.

Etan’s neighborhood is now considered one of the safest places to raise kids in the city. A coordinated effort by multiple NYPD law enforcement agencies to crack down on quality of life crimes, as well as the bigger challenges of drugs and prostitution, championed by Mayor Giuliani, has produced a safer and saner Manhattan than the one Etan knew. It is still not a city, perhaps, where a parent feels comfortable letting their six-year-old walk to the bus stop. But a crime like Etan Patz’s kidnapping shocked an establishment out of the attitude that the metropolis couldn’t change, that we couldn’t have a better life.

For Stan Patz, there’s only one thing left—get justice for Etan. After nine terms in office, Morgenthau is retiring this year. He’s been in office since 1975, four years before the child’s disappearance. Perhaps another DA will feel differently about the case.

“I am more hopeful now than I have been for a decade. I think Robert Morgenthau is the roadblock to getting an indictment on Jose Ramos,” Patz said. “The facts have been out there for 10 years. I want an indictment.”

But Morgenthau, while sympathetic, says his office was never able to “figure out” who was behind Etan’s disappearance.

“We spent all kinds of time and effort on that case, but we just couldn’t come up with anything,” he said. “There are cases where you know who did it but just can’t prove it.”

gotis@nypost.com

Additional reporting by Brad Hamilton.

[end of Post article]

I wrote to Ginger Adams Otis:

Dear Miss Otis:

Thank you for writing this, it’s the first extended article about the case I’ve seen. Though I lived in New York City at the time, and saw many news articles about the search for Etan, I didn’t know basic facts about the case, such as that Etan had been allowed to walk alone to a bus stop a couple of blocks away from his family’s home. Frankly, I don’t think that it’s only since 1979 that parents wouldn’t allow a small child to walk alone in Manhattan. I think that in the 1940s, 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s a parent wouldn’t allow a six year old to go off by itself in Manhattan. Maybe I’m wrong.

A question. Why was Jose Ramos so easily released, not once but twice in 1982, notwithstanding the obvious connections between him and the case: the fact that he was the boyfirend of the woman who had sometimes walked Etan to school, and his marginal lifestyle, and the fact that he had solicited sex from boys? There was obviously something that had to be pursued here, but he was released from custody in 1982 and you don’t say what the authorities’ excuse was for releasing him.

YOu write:

A young city lawyer put Ramos in Rikers Island on a psych evaluation, and he spent several months under jailed observation. After Ramos was given a clean bill of mental health, however, prosecutors dismissed his case instead of charging him with a sex crime—and all without consulting Gelfand.

Vice detectives later explained to an enraged Gelfand that “The Manhattan [district attorney’s] sex crimes unit didn’t like pedophilia cases,” Cohen writes.

Ramos disappeared once again.

It sounds as the the DA’s office didn’t investigate Ramos’s connection to the crime at all or question him at all, other than “keeping him under observation” in jail. Given the tremendous interest in the Etan Patz case, this doesn’t make sense. Weren’t there people, including the Patzes, who were pressing for a more probing investigation of Ramos and wanted results?

Similarly, when Ramos was reinvestigated in 1988 and made a confession which he then retracted, it seems that there was an awful lot pointing at him, yet nothing happened. There must have been more to it than just, “Morgenthau’s sex crimes unit wasn’t interested in child molestation cases.”

If you can throw any more light on these questions, I would appreciate it.

Thanks,

Lawrence Auster
New York City

- end of initial entry -

Shrewsbury writes:

You wrote:

Here are three questions I have for readers of this article. First, do you think it is correct, as suggested by Ginger Otis of the Post, that prior to Etan Patz’s disappearance New York City parents sllowed six year old children to walk unaccompanied on city streets, even if only to a bus stop a block or two away? Second, if you followed the Patz story at the time, were you aware that Mrs. Patz had allowed Etan to walk alone to the bus stop and that that was the way he disappeared? Third, if you followed the story, did you hear at the time about Jose Ramos who was an obvious suspect yet was twice released without explanation?

To address the questions you have posed to your readers:

1) Parents even in Gotham indeed used to be a great deal more nonchalant about such things than they are now. For instance, the young Shrewsbury was sent on errands by himself on East 10th Street and its purlieus no later than the age of seven, and was riding the BMT by himself no later than the age of eight. One evening in the autumn of 1960, entering the subway at 28th Street whilst engrossed in a Superman comic book, he failed to note that he had boarded an uptown train rather than the correct downtown train, and did not realize his error until the train had attained the 125th Street station; when, his brain apparently too undeveloped to understand that all he had to do was go up a flight of stairs and cross to the downtown side, he trudged home in the dark from 125th Street to 10th Street. Obviously he was not killed, but it does not seem to him a good idea to let children of such a tender age loose alone in the city. They are simply incapable of making knowledgeable and intelligent decisions should anything at all unusual occur.

2) Shrewsbury thinks he recalls having the impression at the time of Etan Patz’s disappearance that the boy had been merely waiting in front of his building.

3) Shrewsbury never heard anything about this Ramos cockroach until a few years ago.


Posted by Lawrence Auster at May 04, 2009 02:51 PM | Send
    

Email entry

Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):