Long Island father of three gets flat tire in Harlem, two locals help him, then kill him
What should Jeff Locker have done? Refused the help, and driven on the flat tire until coming to a service station or until getting out of Harlem. Alternatively, he should have avoided driving at night through Harlem altogether—or through any black area. The case immediately reminds us, of course, of Tom Wolfe’s Bonfire of the Vanities, in which “master of the universe” Sherman McCoy has a car problem while driving through Harlem at night with his mistress, leading to an incident that brings about his downfall. But at least, in Wolfe’s book, McCoy was the one who did the killing. [A reader sends this correction: “It was McCoy’s mistress who was driving the Mercedes when it ‘fishtailed’ and hit the unfortunate young man. Of course, she later testified that McCoy did it.”] For a white man to allow strange blacks to help him out in a deserted area of Harlem at ten o’clock at night was an extremely risky thing to do, on the order of playing Russian Roulette, except that in Russian Roulette you only have a one in six chance of being killed, while I’d say that Locker’s behavior created a one in two chance of his being killed. He lived in the New York City area. He could not have been unaware of the threat of black violent crime. Yet he proceeded, Eloi-fashion, as though he were. He behaved like someone who knew nothing about the real world. And now his wife is without a husband and his three children are without a father. The story is in the New York Post:
‘FLAT TIRE’ SLAY David B. writes:
This is a subject that my ex-friend Professor F. was adamant about. Once I remarked that it would be dangerous to have a auto breakdown in a black area. “NO IT’s NOT,” he shouted. The professor was belligerent in insisting that it was no more dangerous in black areas than in the white side of town.LA replies
Excuse me for saying this, but in my view you should not have maintained a friendship with such an idiot for so long. A man who says what you just quoted him as saying is not just a liberal, and is not just a radical liberal. He is a sick man and should be avoided.“This Boy Ain’t No Eloi” writes:
Based on my read of this story and the readers’ comments at the Post, I think there are several questions unresolved. First, did his car actually have a flat tire? If the tires were found fully functional, it could be that the thugs fixed the flat and drove him to a more secluded area to do him in. Second, there is some speculation that the man was there for cocaine or sex. Who knows? In any case, a normal rational person of pallor—even a liberal one—knows best to stay out of Harlem at any time. For crying out loud, aren’t there any black or Latina hookers on Long Island?Carl Simpson writes:
The horrific stories just keep on happening, don’t they? I thought this was all supposed to be a thing of the dark, primitive, superstitious past with the ascension of the Mocha Messiah and the subsequent commencement of a shiny post-racial utopian Obamaland. A small technical correction about the term “Russian Roulette.” The Nagant revolver which inspired the term has seven chambers instead of the six normally encountered in U.S. guns. So it’s actually a one-in-seven chance.Paul K. writes:
You wrote, “For a white man to allow strange blacks to help him out in a deserted area of Harlem at ten o’clock at night was an extremely risky thing to do …” If, in fact, Locker was stuck in Harlem in a car he could drive no further, and he was did not have a gun, he was in no position to allow or not allow strange blacks to “help him out.” Many criminal assaults are preceded by a seemingly benign approach, as the predator takes stock of his prey.LA replies:
I was proceeding on the assumption that he had a flat. With a flat, he should have driven the car on the flat tire until getting to a safe area. But it’s possible he didn’t have a flat: Posted by Lawrence Auster at July 17, 2009 11:22 AM | Send Email entry |