Desolating news from Knoxville atrocity trial
David B. writes:
The jury just gave Cobbins life without parole. At Twitter, reporter Jamie Satterfield said that the jury decided “mitigation outweighed the heinous nature of the crime.” I was afraid that a Nashville jury would not give a death sentence and it turned out that way. It sometimes happens that they will say they would vote death in voir dire, but not do it when the time comes.LA to David:
Tell me the grounds again for moving the trial from Knoxville to Nashville?David replies:
The judge ruled that an impartial jury could not be found in Knox County because of all the publicity. Judge Baumgartner decided on Davidson County (Nashville). One reason he gave was “similar demographics,” which is a lie. Davidson is 26 percent black to nine percent for Knox. The jury was selected in Nashville and bussed to Knoxville.LA replies:
I feel terrible.David replies:
You will remember that late last week I was worried about even a guilty verdict. I would have taken life without parole (LWOP) last Friday. I got my hopes up on Saturday. I should have remained pessimistic. Marco Jawsario writes:
May I remind my amigos at VFR what some have said before at this blog—“Now we see why the whites of yesteryear preferred lynch mob justice.”LA replies:
Readers please note: As I have said about similar remarks at VFR in the past, Mr. Jawsario’s comment, and my posting of it, do not signify an endorsement of lynchings. His point is that in the past Southern whites had a realistic understanding of the dangers that they faced from black savagery (also note, I am not saying that blacks as such are savages, I am saying that black savagery exists), and lynchings were part of the way whites protected themselves from those dangers. I am not defending lynchings at all; they also were savage and evil. But I do say that white Americans in their overreaction to the racial wrongs of the past have completely removed any awareness of the dangers they face from black racial violence and have made themselves suicidally vulnerable to it.Mark P. writes:
Shame about that verdict … but I am curious … Isn’t Tennessee a “concealed carry” state? As a rule, I would never go anywhere in a concealed carry state without a gun.LA replies:
The male victim, Christopher Newsom, was a young fellow of 23.Mark P. replies:
Can’t a 23-year-old carry a gun?LA replies:
You know what I meant. He was a young, naive fellow, the last person in the world to think of carrying a weapon.Mark P. replies:
Ah…yes…liberalism strikes again.LA replies:
ToucheMark replies:
I’m not kidding. A gun and situational awareness goes a long way.LA replies:
I know you weren’t kidding. In my posted version of our exchange, I changed my last reply from “LOL” to “Touche.”Mark replies: But “LOL” is funnier.David B. writes:
You wrote: “You know what I meant. He was a young, naive fellow, the last person in the world to think of carrying a weapon.”LA replies:
Yes, coming out at night from their hidden lairs, exactly like the Morlocks in H.G. Wells’s The Time Machine. Posted by Lawrence Auster at August 26, 2009 08:01 PM | Send Email entry |