High school gang rape
(Note Oct 30 1 a.m.: Many comments have just been posted in this entry.) Jonathan S. writes:
I was wondering what your thoughts were on this horrible gang rape of a 15 year old girl (presumably white) at a prom in California. Apparently there was a crowd of bystanders who did nothing to help also. Links are here, here, and here.LA replies:
I looked at the first link. We don’t know her race. Most of the perps seem to be Hispanic. The victim could have been Hispanic, but was probably white. David B. writes:
Here is a Vdare blog entry concerning the gang rape in Richmond California. The town is only 26 percent Hispanic, but the school is 78 percent Hispanic, two percent white.Carl Simpson writes:
Over at VDARE (on the blog, I think), they had a demographic breakdown of the high school where the rape took place. As I recall, it was about 78 percent “hispanic,” 10 percent black, seven percent asian, and two percent white. The victim could have been white, but it seems more likely she was “Hispanic” (the ridiculous bogus racial classification created by Marxists in the Nixon administration—a race that can be of any race. Alberto Fujimori, former president of Peru, would be labeled “Hispanic” under this whacked-out schema, while Manuel de Falla, the Spanish composer, would not be.)John Hagan writes:
Larry, Here’s a clip on the CA gang rape that’s enlightening to say the least.Nik S. writes:
Regarding the recent crime in Richmond and the continuing war against white culture worldwide, here is a link to another related article on the subject. The article is, “Rape of women, girls a weapon of war in Congo.”Terry Morris writes:
It would also require saying something about the cowardice (which itself is evil) exhibited by do-nothing bystanders such as Jonathan describes.A. Zarkov writes:
According to the California Department of Education, Richmond high school student body is 78 percent Hispanic, 10 percent black, and two percent white. I remember Richmond as a mostly black city. The 2000 Census has Richmond as being 36 percent black, 27 percent Hispanic and about 20 percent white. Obviously Richmond is well on its way to becoming a Hispanic city. Even more ominously, the student body for the whole of California is 49 percent Hispanic and 28 percent white. If students are the future then California belongs to the Hispanics meaning it belongs to Mexico. Perhaps one day California will be only two percent white, then the liberals will be happy—the ones living outside of California that is.Mike writes:
I followed the links that Jonathan S. provided. The third one led to a rather interesting speech. Here’s the transcript. It’s not easy to follow but see my comment at the end. [LA adds: here is the article with video of Kami Baker speaking.]:LA replies:
I had trouble understanding Kami Baker from reading the transcript (in fact when I saw the name Kami Baker m first thought was that it was a black male.). When I watched the video it made a lot more sense. I don’t agree with Mike’s interpretation. She was saying that compared to her previous high school, which had reglar police patrols and adequate security guards, there is no decent security at her school. She was saying that the night of the rape there were all kinds of young men at this dance who shouldn’t have been there, yet the security guards did nothing about them. She was saying that whites are a small minority at the school and that the authorities don’t care about them. Further, we can assume from the fact that she identifies the raped girl as her friend, and that she speaks of whites as a minority, that the victimized girl is white.Marco Jawsario writes:
Someone is going to have to be willing to take arrows for our cause. Someone or some folks are simply going to have to shout to the mountain tops and say 30,000 white women being raped by black men is enough. An organization “Protect Our Women” is a necessity. An organization of gun-toting volunteers who will offer to patrol danger areas, educate the white public, and provide escort services is necessary. It would be nice if older and retired white gentlemen could do this, as they are less subject to PC and job repercussions. “Thirty thousand rapes a year is enough!” should be our battle cry.Daniel B. writes:
We are in the midst of a tragic state of affairs. The incident of the poor fifteen year old girl in Richmond Ca. gives us a barometer reading of the pressure of society against certain individuals. It is, sadly, a low pressure reading; we are in for a storm. What is troubling about the whole affair is not the unacceptable levels of sexual deviance demonstrated by some considerable group of individuals within our society (every single rapist who engaged in that heinious act). No, what is troubling is the fact that there were individuals present who witnessed these henious acts and in the face of such a disgusting display of malicious sexual deviance decided to look and think, “well, she got what was coming to her, the drunk slut,” and there we let her lie, raped and abused. And on walked a few souls who knew we lived in a sad world where intoxicated fifteen year old girls got raped and “ol well better luck to her next time.” Mr. Burke put it well, except for the fact that there aren’t any good men left.Albert Nock writes:
If we define the “jungle” as incidents of rape, then the jungle is shrinking: http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2009-10-06-rape-decline_N.htm In a different article mentioning this record low, an explanation given is that women are more careful about being in unsafe situations than they used to be, which you seem to see as the major factor. If it is not rape generally but gang rape specifically, then I don’t know how those stats have changed. I imagine they have also gone down, since many kinds of crime and disorder seem to track each other.October 30 Terry Morris writes: I know things are bad in Mexifornia, but it’s still extremely difficult for me to wrap my brain around the fact that an apparently white father would, under any circumstances, send his 15 year old daughter to a school dance at which he was aware beforehand that 90% of attendants would be black and/or Hispanic. It seems to me that a heavy responsibility for this horrible crime perpetrated against their daughter lies on the shoulders of her … parent figures. But here again, I’m saying things that are just not allowed anymore.James P. replies to Terry Morris: I agree. I would say there is an aspect of Eloi blindness to it, though I tend to think of “Eloi” as politically correct liberals, and usually such people take care not to live in majority minority neighborhoods. Perhaps the problem is that the proles have adopted Eloi attitudes, but these attitudes are even more untenable for folk who have to live in the very heart of the Morlock jungle.Randy writes:
Here is the beginning of CNN’s article:Van Wijk writes: That the bystanders did nothing shouldn’t really surprise anyone. It stands to reason that the “bystanders” were either Hispanic thugs themselves or simply didn’t have a problem with what was going on. It shouldn’t be assumed that those termed “bystanders” in newspapers are good and decent people. I’m sure a few were enjoying the show.Michael S. writes:
“Necessarities”?LA replies:
I felt that for a contemporary 16 year old, given what our culture is, she expressed herself fairly well. And she looks a mess, with that hair. But there’s some IQ there.Michael S. replies: My wife is a high school English teacher. She would not share your opinion.Michael T. writes:
Great work as usual, in discussing this horrific crime. Perhaps prescient, the “Stuff Black People Don’t Like” blog discussed the United Nations talking about declaring rape a tool of war last month, and used the stats from your Frontpage Magazine article. Posted by Lawrence Auster at October 29, 2009 05:43 PM | Send Email entry |