One shooter, two handguns, 43 G.I.’s shot
Karl D. writes:
I can’t pretend to know how I would have reacted in this situation.But one thing that did cross my mind and surprised me was why, out of a room full of soldiers who are essentially trained killers, he was not bum-rushed by a bunch of soldiers and tackled to the ground.LA replies:
Colin Ferguson, the killer on the Long Island Railroad in 1993, was subdued by several unarmed commuters.N. writes:
Three observations:LA replies:
I didn’t realize that there are pistols that hold hold 25 rounds, since he fired 43 shots and presumably had more to go.Van Wijk writes:
News accounts state that Hasan had two handguns, and that one was semi-automatic. I assume that the other was a revolver of some kind, probably holding six rounds. If the semi-auto was a 9mm, it’s possible Hasan was using an extending magazine holding upwards of 16 rounds. So he walked in with a total of 22 rounds. He shot 43 people, so he must have stopped to reload at least once, but since I seriously doubt he hit someone with every single shot, I’d say it’s a safe bet that he reloaded at least twice. Since he acted alone, no one did anything while he was reloading. They were probably taking cover and just hoping the shooting would stop eventually.Van Wijk continues:
You wrote: “For all their ability to defend themselves from an armed killer, the soldiers at Fort Hood might as well have been Christians in church.”N. writes:
You wrote: “I didn’t realize that there are pistols that hold hold 25 rounds, since he fired 43 shots and presumably had more to go.”LA replies:
Except that it was not a fight, but a slaughter.Paul K. writes:
You asked: “I didn’t realize that there are pistols that hold hold 25 rounds, since he fired 43 shots and presumably had more to go.”N. writes:
A former FBI profiler just claimed on some MSNBC (cable TV) show that the Fort Hood jihadi was carrying a 5.7mm pistol. If true, it would be the FN 5-7.Paul K. writes:
News stories now confirm Hasan’s use of this weapon, as well as a Smith & Wesson .357 magunum revolver.Paul K. continues:
A little more Googling informs me that 30-rd magazines are commercially available for this pistol through sporting goods catalogs.N. writes:
CNN has reported that the Ft. Hood jihadi was carrying a .357 Magnum revolver (probably 6 cartridges) and an FN 5-7 pistolDavid B. writes:
If you have several loaded magazines for an automatic pistol, you can reload in seconds and keep up a stream of fire. All you have to do is hit the magazine release and the empty mag falls out. You then pop in a full magazine and release the slide. You are fully loaded again.Jack S. writes:
This is an occassion for one of my favorite quotes from Machiavelli: .”.before all else, be armed … “Ferg writes:
Chances are very good that he reloaded at least once. Also, while shooting in one direction he would have been somewhat vulnerable from some other direction. As an experienced defensive pistol sport shooter, I can tell you that a good mag swap can be done in under a second, even by an old man like me. However, having said that there is another aspect to the situation as I see it. When I was a young Private on active duty in 1964 we were trained to give officers, particularly higher ranking officers, an almost god like respect. I am sure that at that time as an impressionable youth, I would have been shocked into inaction by the sight of a MAJOR opening fire on a group of us. It would have taken me a while to work out what was going on, and what an appropriate response would be. At a guess, I would have just hit the dirt and tried to crawl under something. I was trained to a robotic like obedience to officers, and would have never argued with one, let alone attacked one. Today the military has more relaxed relationships between officers and enlisted, but I would think there is still a strong disinclination to physically assault an officer, if you are merely a Private.Charles T. writes:
You wrote: “For all their ability to defend themselves from an armed killer, the soldiers at Fort Hood might as well have been Christians in church. ”LA replies to Ferg: Fascinating point.Ferg replies:
Thank you Mr. Auster. I have been thinking more about it and it can be put into a non military light. Say you as a civilian are in a room with a group of people and a uniformed police officer from your home town or State walks into the room, takes out his handgun and just starts shooting. How quickly are you going to be able to figure out what is going on, and make an agressive response to it? I am a legaly armed civilian with a great deal of training and experience in defensive pistol shooting. One of the things you are trained NOT to do, is shoot a uniformed police officer. It would be extrordinarily hard for me to draw down on a police officer let alone start shooting him. It would also be very difficult to grab some other guys and attack and subdue the officer. It just runs counter to what we have been taught all our lives. You have to be thinking something like THERE IS SOME GOOD REASON THIS OFFICER IS SHOOTING. MUST BE BAD GUYS AROUND. At least that is the way I see it. Posted by Lawrence Auster at November 06, 2009 05:18 PM | Send Email entry |