The Amanda Knox case
A reader sent, and I’ve read, the long Vanity Fair article by Judy Bachrach on the murder of British college student Meredith Kercher in Perugia, Italy in November 2007. Charged in the case are Amanda Knox, an American who was 20 a the time, her Italian boyfriend at the time of the murder, Raffaele Sollecito, and Rudy Guede, a native of the Ivory Coast. The facts of the case are very much up in the air. What is clear—independently of the unsettled question of their guilt in the murder—is the absolute depravity of the suspects, who are extreme examples of the casual nihilism that our aggressively secular society has unleashed, particularly among young people. William Jennings Bryan was right. Convince human beings that there is no God and that they are animals, and they will begin to act that way.
A reader writes:
Please don’t quote me by name because my ideas about Amanda Knox are completely subjective and I have nothing concrete to back them up. To me she is a walking contradiction. The first time I saw a photo of Ms. Knox, I was completely taken by her beauty. It was perfection to me.John B. writes:
She’s not that good-looking—and besides, the white race has never lacked for women who, in the power of their emergent (and short-lived) sexual appeal, delight in brutality. The record on that is clear, I suspect, from ancient times to the present. It’s just one of the several ugly manifestations of vanity, which is the race’s hallmark—and which most whites parochially regard as an element of “human nature” (like drunk driving). Liberalism, not incidentally, is merely the same vanity—stupidly directed against the race itself.LA replies:
I reject this current notion I’ve hearing more and more lately, seemingly coming out of the decadent Roissy world, that women’s sexual appeal is short lived. Yes, there is a period, in the late teens and early twenties, when females have some special quality that is hard to describe in words. The fifth century B.C. Athenian scultpors caught it. Though it’s short lived for each individual, it’s also a timeless thing, recurring from one generation to the next.,November 23 John Hagan writes:
Ann Coulter read the trial transcripts of the Knox case, and in this column cuts through all the noise that surrounds this situation in my opinion and implicates Knox. What a mess the American press is !LA replies:
Well, this was a tonic after reading the Judy Bachrach article in Vanity Fair, which creates the impresion that the facts are difficult to determine and it’s not at all clear that Knox and her boyfriend were involved.Robert writes:
I spent several hours trying to wrap my brain around this case and Amanda Knox by reading everything I could find. Her supporters point out that the forensic evidence (knife) with her DNA on it found at Raffaele’s apartment couldn’t be the murder weapon and was likely improperly handled. I suppose both assertions are quite possible. However, from what I have read, it’s pretty clear that the crime scene was staged and partially cleaned up. Glass shards in the bedroom were on top of the clothes strewn about the bedroom floor and a footprint outside of Meredith’s locked door had to be lifted using Luminol. Why would Guede clean up one foot print and not the bathroom? Why would Guede stage a burglary?November 24 John B. writes:
Amanda Knox is not that good-looking—and besides, the white race has never lacked for young women who, in the power of their emergent sexual appeal, delight in brutality. The record on that is clear, I suspect, from ancient times to the present. It’s just one of the several ugly manifestations of vanity, which is the race’s hallmark.LA replies:
How is brutality related to vanity?John B. replies:
The women are aware that no matter how viciously they behave, their sex appeal will not be reduced. That’s fun—and they indulge it. That’s why I say their viciousness is born of vanity.
With their facial expressions, they look like real-life Bacchae, fresh from dismembering a human victim, and intoxicated by their exploits. You can almost see the bloody flesh of their victim on the lips of the one at the left. We don’t know what experiences the Greeks had that gave them such insight into the depths, but the truth of it speaks for itself. 2,500 years ago, Euripides precisely described certain women in 20th century America.John B. replies:
I can say only that I agree.John continues:
You might want to read a 1990 New York Times article about John Moran’s opera The Manson Family. The opera’s director, Bob McGrath, says:Roger G. writes:
Ridiculous, ridiculous, ridiculous:LA replies:
In reply to Roger, I don’t agree that the expressions on their faces are just normal and pleasant. Especially with the one on fhe left and the one on the right, there is a self-conscious naughtiness, a disturbing, even depraved looseness about their mouths. I can’t say for certain how I would have reacted to these photos if they hadn’t been presented in the context of the Manson trial, but I can tell you for sure that I would not have said that these girls merely had pleasant expressions. I would have said, at the least, that there was something not right about them.Matthew writes:
I was surprised by your comments about Amanda Knox. While it is obvious that her moral standards are somewhat different from your own you do realise that she has been framed?LA replies:
It seems to me that you’re the one looking at this through a lens, a racial lens, that makes you uninterested in the facts. In my initial entry I didn’t say I thought she was guilty. I said the question of her guilt was up in the air. I separated the depraved behavior of her and her boyfriend from the question of her guilt. Evidently you didn’t notice that, because in kneejerk fashion you charge that because I morally disapprove of her, therefore I believe she’s guilty of the murder, whereas what I said was the exact opposite of that. How about reading what people are actually saying, instead of just looking at things through your own preconceptions?Robert writes:
I was having a hard time buying into John B.’s observations until he elaborated. Now I understand where he is coming from. His photo of the co-defendants in the Charles Manson murder case really struck me. I am too young to remember much about the Manson murders … but look at these happy, normal-looking women! Without the context, one wouldn’t expect them capable of harming a puppy. (I wrote this before reading a nearly identical comment from another reader).John B. replies to LA’s reply to Roger
Interesting. I’m not sure I can say the same—but that might be simply because liberalism has led me to put my guard down.Roger G. writes:
This is a point that can be tested. I think Larry should try what I suggested, show that picture to anyone who doesn’t know its origin, and see what reactions he gets.LA replies:
But the only test that would count here would have been to ask us, prior to our knowing who the girls are. Of course, many or most people will see nothing there. That doesn’t prove anything. Still, it would be worthwhile trying the test.Roger G. writes:
By the way, when I made my “ridiculous” comment, I knew I wouldn’t have to waste valuable electrons explaining that I was attacking your position, not you. Your disparagers should note this point.LA replies:
Don’t worry about it, it was clear that you thought that what I said was ridiculous, and your comment was reasonable.Roger replies:
That’s what I mean. Of course you recognize the difference between a criticism of an opinion, and an ad hominem attack. But all of those who write back and forth, telling each other what a terrible fellow you are, apparently don’t.November 25 Daniel B. writes:
While reading the post regarding Dionysus, maenads, female cruelty etc. I was reminded of two other incidents. First was the pornographically violent “poetry” written by Melanie Wells (the murdered daughter of the murdered pastor in Virginia). Secondly, the callous disregard demonstrated by Miss Knox is a mirror image of the seeming indifference shown by Casey Anthony in the wake of her child’s disappearance and death. Whether they are guilty of the actual murder or not, the callous disregard for life demonstrated by these women just goes to remind us what a dark place our civilization is in.November 29 Matthew replies to LA:
Yes you are right. I should not have written such drivel. Apologies for wasting your time.LA replies:
That’s ok. Not a waste of time. That’s what discussion is about. Posted by Lawrence Auster at November 22, 2009 05:49 PM | Send Email entry |