The wages of mass-importing blacks into a formerly non-black society

(Comments on this entry begin here.)

A reader in England sends a huge story from the March 25 Mail about the sentencing of the Night Stalker, who before he was arrested in 2009 attacked at least 500 elderly people in London over a period of 17 years, breaking into their homes at night, terrorizing them, sexually assaulting them or raping them. He is Jamaican born Delroy Grant. His defense? His wife, seeking revenge on him, stored up his semen and planted it at each of the crime scenes.

The story does not discuss the race of the victims. But from the way they speak, they sound like white Britons, not blacks.

Is the title of this entry racist, because it implies that blacks as such are rapists? Of course I do not say that blacks as such are rapists. I have no intention or desire to instill in readers a fear of black people as such. I live in New York City, and I interact with black people comfortably, if superficially, every day. Nevertheless it is a simple fact that sexual crimes and other violent crimes are about an order of magnitude higher among blacks than all other racial groups. And all the liberals in the universe cannot design a social program that will change that. So when a white society mass-imports blacks, as Britain did in the years following World War II, it is subjecting its own population to a future of being raped, robbed, and killed by blacks. And when that society systematically blinds itself to the reality of black violence, of black violence against whites, and of the vastly higher level of black psychopathy (as brought out in Richard Lynn’s studies), and when, most of all, that society punishes people for discussing the reality of black violence, it makes the problem much worse.

It’s very simple. If Britain had not allowed black immigration, tens of thousands of violent criminals, rapists, and murderers would never have existed in Britain, including Delroy Grant. And if Britain would initiate a reverse migration of blacks to their native or ancestral countries, violent crime in Britain would plummet.

From the article:

Passing sentence, Judge Peter Rook told Grant he remained a ‘very dangerous man capable of committing heinous crimes and causing incalculable harm’ and warned him he could die in jail.

The judge said: ‘You targeted elderly victims living alone. Your actions blighted the remaining precious years of their lives. Their homes, where many of them had lived for years, should have been their safest refuge where they could have expected to live their lives undisturbed and at peace.

‘You chose to invade their homes when they were in their beds at night.

‘It’s hard to imagine the extreme fear that the feel of your gloved hand and the sight of your masked figure looming above them must have been felt by your victims in their beds.’

The judge noted that in all but one case Grant targeted elderly people living alone, suggesting that his attacks involved ‘considerable planning’.

He told him: ‘Your offending spans a period of 17 years. Five London boroughs were affected by your offending.

‘During that period your activities must have terrified a whole community, as your counsel accepted.

‘Thousands of people in south London have been living in fear that they might be your next victim.’

Detectives believe the 53-year-old’s tally of victims could even be as high as 1,000. Many of the elderly men and women on whom he preyed have either died or are too traumatised, ashamed or confused to come forward.

But DCI Sutton—who led a British investigation into the disappearance of Madeline McCann and was involved in the Millie Dowler case—caught Grant within days.

After discovering 100 out of 600 possible break-ins the ‘Night Stalker’ had been linked to were in the same street in Croydon, south London, a giant undercover ‘rat trap’ operation involving 70 officers was set up.

One of the force’s three helicopters was also employed to hover at high altitude overhead, using powerful infra-red cameras to see in the dark.

On their first night of observation, the ‘Night Stalker’ struck three times, twice just to the north of their net and once to the south east, one street away.

‘It’s hard to imagine the extreme fear that the feel of your gloved hand and the sight of your masked figure looming above them must have been felt by your victims in their beds’

Judge Peter Rook, passing sentence

The timing of each burglary meant the suspect must have used a vehicle and travelled down Orchard Avenue.

There was hardly any traffic on the road and investigators identified one vehicle as the one probably used by the Grant.

A CCTV camera from a local business caught a shadowy outline identified by a specialist as a post-2005 model silver-grey Vauxhall Zafira.

Two weeks later, after the suspect had lied low, the car was spotted again and the man that had eluded blundering officers for years was arrested.

The top officer, who is now retired, said yesterday: ‘People say he was a charmer, a nice guy, a regular bloke.

‘There was a lot of surprise when he was arrested. People just wouldn’t have thought that Delroy Grant was the Night Stalker.’

Speaking to the Mirror, DCI Sutton added: ‘I was very proud of the team that we caught him after 17 days but unfortunately we’d been trying for 17 years.’

Yesterday Grant was warned he faced a sentence which could see him die in prison.

A judge warned him the jail term would be ‘very long indeed’ after a jury convicted him of 29 specimen charges by a 10-2 majority.

They rejected the ‘ludicrous’ assertion that his ex-wife planted his DNA at the crime scenes to ‘frame’ him for a wave of attacks which terrorised old people in south London, Kent and Surrey from the early 1990s.

One of the victims—a grey-haired woman he indecently assaulted in her home—stared at him through opera glasses from the back of Woolwich Crown Court as the verdicts were delivered.

Guilty: Delroy Grant

Pervert: Night Stalker Delroy Grant

Depraved: Sick Delroy Grant broke into the homes of elderly people and subjected them to terrifying and vile sexual assaults in a 17-year reign of terror across south London

Grant—who refuses to admit his crimes or offer any explanation—simply shook his head. In a corner of the court, a policewoman sobbed into her hand.

Manhunt: This police appeal picture shows an officer riding a motorcycle virtually identical to the one used by Delroy Grant

Manhunt: This police appeal picture shows an officer riding a motorcycle virtually identical to the one used by Delroy Grant

The massive manhunt dedicated to finding the Night Stalker was riddled with a series of errors, oversights and ‘simple misunderstandings’ which critically undermined it, a formal inquiry concluded yesterday.

The Independent Police Complaints Commission said the mistakes and confusion ‘had horrific consequences’. Some of the bungles proved to be catastrophic.

In May 1999 an elderly woman was burgled in Bromley, Kent. A Neighbourhood Watch co-ordinator told police she had seen a black man putting on gloves and walking towards the house. She gave details of his car, including the registration number.

Detectives ran a trace on it which showed it was registered to Delroy Easton Grant’s wife Jennifer at their home nearby. When the name ‘Delroy Grant’ was fed to police computer databases, it identified six people of that name.

One Delroy Grant, in London, showed a burglary conviction. For a moment, it looked as if the hunt could be over. But a DNA sample taken from this man, which eliminated him from the inquiry, somehow became assigned to Delroy Easton Grant’s profile.

Mask of respectability: Delroy Grant, back row centre, on his wedding day to second wife Jennifer

Mask of respectability: Delroy Grant, back row centre, on his wedding day to second wife Jennifer

Mask of respectability: Delroy Grant on his wedding day with second wife Jennifer

Evil secrets: Official wedding photo of Grant with second wife Jennifer

Kit: A blue cagoule and black woolly hat were found by police when they searched Grant’s Vauxhall Zafira

Kit: A blue cagoule and black woolly hat were found by police when they searched Grant’s Vauxhall Zafira

Apology: Commander Martin Foy said sorry after the conclusion of the case

Apology: Commander Martin Foy said sorry after the conclusion of the case

Although a detective did visit Delroy and Jennifer Grant’s home to check on his movements on the night of the burglary, Delroy was out—and no follow-up action was taken.

Had his DNA been taken that day, he would have been identified instantly as the Night Stalker rapist.

In 2001, a BBC Crimewatch appeal prompted a call saying an e-fit picture resembled Delroy Grant.

Investigations were carried out—but Delroy Easton Grant was wrongly eliminated by the 1999 DNA blunder.

In 2003, an elderly woman attacked by Grant scratched him in the struggle and got some of his DNA under her fingernails.

She told police her attacker looked like one of the minicab drivers at a local firm she used. In fact Grant did work for that firm—but he was never interviewed.

He was not caught until November 2009 after his car was captured on CCTV near a crime scene in Croydon.

Commander Simon Foy, head of the Metropolitan Police homicide and serious crime command, issued an apology to victims and their families for the ‘missed opportunity’ to catch him, and for ‘the trauma suffered by all those victims and our failure to bring Grant to justice earlier’.

He added: ‘Grant is a rapist who preyed upon the most vulnerable section of society. He has never given any explanation for his offending and we may never know why he did it.’

Brave victims relive their ordeals before packed court as sex fiend is jailed

Victims came face to face with the depraved sex fiend today for the first time since their attacks to relive their terrifying ordeals.

The court heard moving statements today from Grant’s victims and their families about the impact his sick crimes had on them.

One 85-year-old woman, referred to as Miss J for legal reasons, bravely entered the witness box to give evidence about how she continues to suffer from her ordeal nearly nine years ago.

She was 77 when Grant burgled and indecently assaulted her at her bungalow in Shirley, Croydon, in October 2002.

Pervert: A crowbar which he had used to enter a house was also found in the boot of the Zafira

Pervert: A crowbar which he had used to enter a house was also found in the boot of the Zafira

In a statement from 2003 she said: ‘I have found that time is not a great healer. I don’t think it’s got any easier over the last year.

‘I certainly haven’t got back my peace of mind. Nobody can guarantee it won’t happen again.’

She added: ‘It’s something I shall never forget completely. It still feels so recent.’

The judge asked if her experiences at Grant’s hands still affected her today.

Miss J replied: ‘If I go out I like to be home before dark. I do a lot of locking and bolting, and taking precautions … It changed my life.’

She was watched from the dock by Grant, who sat impassively throughout most of the hearing but occasionally shook his head.

The judge paid tribute to Miss J’s ‘courageous’ testimony.

He also quoted from the son of another of the sexual predator’s victims, who said: ‘It has ruined the winter years of my mother’s life, and she has to live with this for the rest of her life.’

‘He could go from charm to monster in a second’, says ex-wife

The ex-wife of Night Stalker Delroy Grant said: ‘He could be charm itself and turn into a monster in a second.’

Janet Watson branded him ‘dangerous’ and scheming and declared: ‘I hope he suffers every day in prison.’

Janet Watson told The Sun she was beaten by Grant following their marriage, declaring ‘being with him was a living hell’.

Charm itself: An artist’s impression of Grant’s ex wife Janet Watson giving evidence in court as he looks on from the dock

Charm itself: An artist’s impression of Grant’s ex wife Janet Watson giving evidence in court as he looks on from the dock

The 53-year-old also laid bare her views of Grant’s defence claim that she ‘fitted him up’ by storing his semen for decades and distributing it at different burglaries.

She said: ‘He is an evil man. I was never going to let him win.

‘There must be something very wrong with him to think he’d get away with saying I did all that just to spite him.’

Referring to the trial at Woolwich Crown Court, she said: ‘I could see people laughing in the public gallery.

‘When I left court, I thought, ‘He’s going to get what he deserves’.’

Grant and Ms Watson tied the knot in 1975. The couple had two sons together, Delroy Junior, 35, and Michael, 32.

Ms Watson said he attacked her in front of the children and beat her when she was pregnant.

She said Michael had to undergo an operation following his birth due to the trauma induced by Grant’s physical attacks. Ms Watson also spoke of his infidelity as Grant cheated on her with other women.

There is much more in the article.

- end of initial entry -

Greg W. writes:

You said:

“Nevertheless it is a simple fact that sexual crimes and other violent crimes are about an order of magnitude higher among blacks than all other racial groups. And all the liberals in the universe cannot design a social program that will change that.”

To the PC left, only positive qualities unique to a certain minority can be attributed (for example, blacks are generally more athletic, and nobody would deny this). This means that we are only allowed to notice a pattern of behavior or physical characteristic in minorities that show them in a positive light, and never can we point out a negative. Positive behavior is a product of their race and culture, negative behavior is not.

Here’s the reason. Many liberals claim that race is only a social construct and does not exist. We are all “human.” Crime rates being higher amongst the black population has nothing to do with their race and culture, it’s just humans being humans and these humans are coincidentally disproportionately black; OR black criminality is higher due to discrimination and police focusing mostly on blacks, therefore letting all the other races get away with crimes.

So race exists when a minority is a “victim,” but not a perpetrator. In many cases, we all know the perpetrator is made to be a victim of the white society. Race exists when filling out a college entrance form. Race exists when blacks don’t score well enough on an exam to be promoted to Fire Captain. Race exists when a Tea Party shows up to protest Obama, and the crowd is mostly white. Race exists when there is too many of a certain demographic employed by a company. But race does NOT exist in the context of criminality.

There is undoubtedly no social program that will change black behavior, therefore the left must deny the problem of black violence and crime, blame the victim/turn the black criminal into the victim, or blame white society. Otherwise they have to admit that multiculturalism and diversity is a magnificent failure.

Alexis Zarkov writes:

The following narrative is slightly technical, but provides valuable insight into criminal behavior, and explains why many white people have so much difficulty in understanding the criminal behavior of minority groups. The tendency towards linear thinking fails and fails miserably.

Most people are not prone to crime or violence under normal circumstances. We go about our daily tasks interacting with average people without incident—crime is rare. Let’s focus on a single human personality trait: aggression. The tendency towards aggression correlates with crime. This should be obvious. For example we know from common experience that men are more aggressive than women, and (no surprise) far more likely to be in jail. Like so many human attributes, aggressiveness follows a bell curve. Let’s define the average tendency towards aggression as having a numerical value of 1. We could set this at any number, the choice of 1 is arbitrary. Therefore most of the people you interact with will have an aggressiveness around 1. In other words, “1” is the norm. Now let’s try to calibrate the aggressiveness bell curve for whites. If we take 3.46 and above as the amount of aggressiveness that leads to crime, then the bell curve puts that at the upper 0.7 percent of the area under the bell curve which corresponds to the incarceration rate for white people. In other words, anyone with an aggressiveness that exceeds 3.46 is prone to criminal behavior. Our whole criminal justice system is normed on 3.46. Again remember the units here are arbitrary, the actual values would make no notice in conclusions.

Now suppose we move the whole bell curve up by a mere 10 percent, so the average aggressiveness is now 1.1 instead of 1. How does this affect the fraction of people who will exceed the threshold of 3.46? The fraction increases to 0.9 percent. In other words, a small change in average aggressiveness leads to a much larger change in the fraction of people who are aggressive to the point of being criminal. In this example a 10 percent increase in the average caused a 29 percent increase (0.9/0.7 = 1.29). Similarly a 20 percent change in average aggressiveness (1.0 to 1.2) would lead to a 70 percent increase in criminality. And so on. The effect is extremely non-linear.

Blacks have an incarceration rate of 4.8 percent, which corresponds to an average aggressiveness level of 1.8, or 80 percent greater than the white norm. Whites with this level of aggression would lie in the upper 21 percent of the white bell curve. This is enough to notice in one’s interactions with black people. Most teachers would tell you that they find their black boys much more aggressive than their white boys even though they tend to interact with the average black boy most of the time.

Hispanics lie between white and blacks in aggressiveness. Their incarceration rate is 1.9 percent which corresponds to an average aggressiveness of 1.39 (instead of 1.0) or 39 percent higher than whites. Whites with 1.39 would lie in the upper 35 percent. Note that by definition, 50 percent of whites are above the white norm. Thus white people interacting with the average Hispanic would tend not notice their increased aggressiveness because it’s too close to the average white level. Many white people would say, “I know lots of Hispanics, and they seem fairly normal, I don’t understand why they have 2.7 times the incarceration rate of white people.” This kind of thinking leads people to believe that Hispanics are the target of invidious discrimination by the police and the courts. They simply don’t understand the highly non-linear relationship between crime and aggression.

Finally we can see why Britain has serious black crime problem and has trouble coming to terms with it. Historically Britain has been a low crime country. The very rare Jack-the-Ripper becomes a sensation precisely because violent crime has been so atypical among British white people. As such their average level of aggression is low and their whole society, including the police and criminal justice system, is calibrated on this basis. Transplant a different people, even one with only a slight or moderate increase in aggression, and you will experience dramatic increases in criminality. Simply put, what’s normal for blacks is not normal for whites. By the way the same analysis applies to IQ point for point, and linear thinking again fails. Using the same analysis we can predict the ratio of pass rates for white, blacks, and Hispanics we see on competitive tests such as the one for firemen, bar exam pass rates, admissions to UC Berkeley etc. All this simply on the IQ differences. The predictive power of this kind of analysis is enormous and gets suppressed in the popular press for strictly political reasons.

Richard W. writes:

This was an interesting and quite explicit article. It dealt with the crisis of black violence from a European perspective, however. Nothing wrong with that, but so many things are possible in Europe that are not possible here. And, so many things are wrong here that are not yet as bad in Europe.

The scale of our black problem far surpasses anything in Europe. Even the worst North African slum of Paris is nothing compared to Detroit, Newark or Compton in terms of everyday depravity and violence. The protagonist in this story was a classic loner psychopath. The protagonists in our recent horror stories have been huge, neighborhood sized groups of feral black gang members. 19 in Cleveland, Texas and 6 or 7 in Riverside, California.

Perhaps the UK could, somehow, encourage their black minority to repatriate to wherever they came from. We in the USA are not a “formerly non-black society.” We do not have the option of seeking the repatriation of blacks in America anywhere. As they will quickly remind you: they did not ask to be brought here.

What options do we have? It is something I have spent considerable time thinking about and have no proposed solution. At some point, lacking any possible solution, recounting the problem endlessly becomes wearisome.

You have offered solid advice at the individual and family level. Know the truth, act accordingly. Do not raise your daughters to be Eloi. I’m with you on all that, but even if every GOP voter took that to heart we would still wake up every day and read about various black criminal atrocities, go to work to pay exorbitant taxes to maintain the welfare state which largely exists to try to support blacks, suffer through the “empty black suit” syndrome while there, and return home in fear on public transport that is frequently dominated by roaming gangs of black youth.

Please apply your considerable intelligence to thinking up a solution to this intolerable state of affairs, as you have for the problem of Muslim terrorism in the USA. A plan, even one which the vast majority dismiss as unworkable, has tremendous power, including fostering hope and optimism. It’s been remarkable to see your plan, originally rejected by most on the right, now gaining considerable momentum.

We need such a plan to deal with our deeper, more organic, racial problems in America. Perhaps you, or your readers, can define one.

LA replies:

Come on, Richard, I have spelled out many times the outlines of my solution to America’s black problem. It consists of a re-traditionalized culture, which means in particular the end of the regime of sexual liberation, for whites and blacks (because blacks follow, with much more disastrous results for themselves, the promptings of the larger culture); the total rejection of white guilt as the explanation for black failure and dysfunction; the repeal of most civil rights and anti-discrimination legislation; the total elimination of all minority preferences and privileges; and a return to natural, local segregation in residency and schools. In a re-traditionalized America, two things will happen to black behavior. It will significantly improve (which will be good for blacks and for everyone); and it will be, to an extent unimaginable at present, separated from the majority population and the majority culture.

Alexis Zarkov writes:

In reading through Mail Online article, I noticed this sentence. “A judge warned him the jail term would be ‘very long indeed’ after a jury convicted him of 29 specimen charges by a 10-2 majority.” I assume that “specimen charges” means “specified charges,” but I’m puzzled by the “10-2 majority.” Does this mean that in Britain the prosecution does not need a unanimous decision by a jury in a criminal case? Evidently yes because even in the U.S. the Louisiana Constitution and legislature authorize convictions by less than a unanimous jury vote. What I find shocking is that two jurors were not convinced of the defendants guilt despite the overwhelming evidence against him. Is this an English example of an O.J. type decision by two black jurors?

Ortelio writes:

The evidence was said by the British papers to be overwhelming. But the jury came within one vote of acquitting Grant; their verdict was by majority of 10:2. Nothing can be—or at any rate was—reported about the ethnic composition of the jury that came so close to a dreadful miscarriage of justice and to imposing great danger on their fellow citizens.

Julian C. writes:

Another example of this. An indian friend of mine in the UK suggested that the government should have to pay significant compensation to the families of those harmed by crime. This might force them to adopt a more sensible approach to immigration.

Posted by Lawrence Auster at March 31, 2011 10:03 AM | Send