All rape in Oslo is by Third-World immigrants and asylees

From Norwegian television comes an astonishing news segment in which we are matter-of-factly informed that EVERY rape in Oslo over the last year was committed by a non-Western man, and that of 86 rapes in Oslo over the last five years, all 83 in which the perpetrator was identified were committed by a non-Western man. We can assume that almost all of these non-Western men were Muslims. We’re also told that “almost all” the victims of these rapes have been ethnically Norwegian women.

One of the victims, a young woman interviewed on the program, says that her tormenter told her how this is the way it’s done in his religion.

Such frankness about violence in the West committed by non-Westerners is unprecedented. How much of VFR is about the media’s and the authorities’ continuous cover-up of the nonwhite/non-Western nature of various crimes? And here a mainstream news program just comes out and says it.

How can this not lead to discussion in Norway on the wisdom of Muslim and other non-Western immigration? How can Norwegians not say to themselves: “Do we want girls and women in our country to be raped, who otherwise would not have been raped? Yet that is what happens as a result of Muslim and other Third-World immigration. If we allow Muslim immigration, we are consigning a certain number of Norwegian girls and women to be raped who otherwise would not have been raped.”

Imagine that this segment became the model for future media reports on race and crime and the realities of Islam! Imagine news stations stating regularly items such as this: “X percent of violent crime is by blacks and nonwhite Hispanics”; or, “Almost all interracial rape in America is of white women by black men, with virtually no rape of black women by white men”; or, “Blacks have been systematically organizing ‘flash mobs’ which deliberately target whites in cities across America.”

Who knows? We might even see a news story stating that Maj. Nidal Hasan of the U.S. Army was a declared jihadist and terror supporter and the Army knew this but that they didn’t do anything about it because that would be anti-diversity.

The same clip, along with a transcript, is provided here. Here is the transcript, which I have edited to eliminate the time markers:

In Oslo all sexual assaults involving rape in the past year have been committed by males of non-Western background. This was the conclusion of a police report published today. This means that every single rape assault in the last five years, where the rapist could be identified, he was a man of foreign origin.

The young girl we are about to meet was raped about two years ago. As she entered her apartment she was assaulted and endured hours of the threats and violence and rape by a man unknown to her. She will be struggling with this experience for the rest of her life.

Victim: “I have found it difficult to go out shopping on my own because I felt anxious. I was simply too afraid to go out the door, and had problems contacting and speaking to friends and family and simply live a normal life.”

In April a few weeks ago, four women were assaulted and raped on the same night. None of the perpetrators has yet been found.

Today Oslo police presented the total figures revealing how in the past year, all sexual assaults involving rape have been committed by men of non-Western background. These are troubling statistics. From 2005-2010 a total of 86 sexual assaults involving rape were reported. In 83 cases the man was described as having “non-Western appearance.” These are all the cases in which the perpetrator could be identified by the victim. Many of the perpetrators who commit these rapes are on the edge of society, often unemployed, arriving from traumatized countries. In the past five years it has often been asylum seekers.

This girl was raped by a man of Pakistani heritage. She is an ethnic Norwegian as is almost all victims who are assaulted and then raped. “He said, that he had the right to do exactly as he wanted to a woman.” Why? “Because that is how it was in his religion.” “Women did not have rights or opinions, he was in charge.” The way women are viewed is at least one of the questions we have to ask in order to understanding the motive of the perpetrators. It should not stand on its own, as a stigma, but it is an element we must have the courage to address.

- end of initial entry -

Lars Hedegaard writes:

I quoted this in my recent book “Muhammed’s Girls: Violence, murder and rape in the House of Islam.”

Bjorn Larsen writes:

Quite shocking isn’t it, to hear such stright talk. But note, even here, you get the beginning of the excuses. Many of the perpetrators who commit these rapes “are on the edge of society, often unemployed, arriving from traumatized countries.” In the past five years it has often been asylum seekers. Norway will surely consider its humanitarian asylum seeker program to be worth a few rapes.

Unni Wikan, a professor of social anthropology at the University of Oslo said in 2001 that “Norwegian women must take their share of responsibility for these rapes” because Muslim men found their manner of dress provocative. The professor’s conclusion was not that Muslim men living in the West needed to adjust to Western norms, but the exact opposite: “Norwegian women must realize that we live in a Multicultural society and adapt themselves to it.” That was ten years ago!

Vincent Chiarello writes;

This letter by me responding to Brenda Walker’s article on rape in Oslo was posted at Vdare yesterday. Given my time in Oslo, and information from my grandson who lives there, I am very much aware—albeit not in the percentages—of the growing police problem of Third World men (overwhelmingly Moslem) raping Norwegian women. There is one aspect of this situation that I did not include in the Vdare piece, and would gladly send it on if you think it would be of help: it involves the Norwegian Party’s rescinding of a policy that pretty much prevented illegal immigrants from ever reaching Norway in the first place.

A Reader Shares His Experience With Oslo, Now Menaced By Immigrant Violence

Brenda Walker’s posting about the rape of Norwegian women by “utlending” (foreigners) is accurate as far as it goes, but there is far more to tell. To begin with, this problem is not new.

From 1984-88, I served as the Press Attache to the US Embassy in Oslo, and even then (In the mid-80s, Norway was about 97% homogeneous, including other Scandinavians and Nordics), in speaking to the police, I was informed that the growing drug trafficking in Norway was mainly the result of the influx of Moslem—mainly Pakistani—immigrants, but was confined to the discos and group gathering places of young people in the capital. Many policemen also pointed out that the normally independent Norwegian woman’s approach to sexual relations was being transformed by this Moslem presence. To many of these new immigrants from Moslem countries, the sight of a woman at a disco showing cleavage was a sign that she was not only a prostitute, but open to any and all suggestions.

I have a grandson who lives in Oslo. Five or more years ago, he wrote me that the central train station in Oslo had become a very dangerous place, a stunning reversal of the social order that has always been part of Oslo’s history. Further, the drug problem had now grown to proportions unheard of his Norwegian criminal history. No one who reads VDARE.com should be surprised.

What remains perplexing to me after more than twenty year absence is to hear, of all things, a female police officer explain away the rape problem in Norway as a result of people coming “from traumatized countries.” If this police approach continues, I assure you that the numbers of rapes will not decrease, and Norway, along with many other Western European countries, will continue down the path of national suicide.

Mark A. writes:

You wrote:

How can this not lead to discussion in Norway on the wisdom of Muslim and other non-Western immigration? How can Norwegians not say to themselves: “Do we want girls and women in our country to be raped, who otherwise would not have been raped? Yet that is what happens as a result of Muslim and other Third-World immigration. If we allow Muslim immigration, we are consigning a certain number of our girls and women to be raped who otherwise would not have been raped.”

I sincerely doubt that the average working-man in Norway would disagree you. It’s the elite who disagree. It’s the same in this country, the U.K., and Australia. Go ahead and vote for whomever you wish—the elite have selected two nice candidates for you to pick from. For those who think a Republican victory in 2012 will matter, note who ordered airports to *stop* profiling Muslims during his first year in office: George W. Bush.

The Great White Status Struggle marches on …

LA replies:

To trivialize our civilization’s suicidal path as a “status” struggle suggests a fundamental inability or unwillingness to grasp the nature of the mortal crisis in which we find ourselves. That crisis has been brought about by beliefs that are by now profoundly rooted in most Westerners, not just the liberal elite. If the liberal elite were not there, the problem would still be there. For example, most American Christian conservatives will recoil from you if you say that non-Western immigration represents a threat to our country. They don’t recoil out of a desire for “status”; they recoil because they believe that such views are morally wrong.

The refusal to recognize that people actually believe the things they believe, and don’t just believe them out of self-interest, is a product of the same materialist reductive thinking which is a central cause of the West’s suicidal loss of confidence in itself.

Mark A. writes:

Trivializing? I am not trivializing anything. There is nothing trivial whatsoever about the civil war amongst the elite white castes that has been raging since at least the 1930s, if not earlier. If this were trivial, surely it would be a topic of conversation amongst at least 1% of America’s chattering classes. However, nobody discusses the topic. Do you think the masses sit down at dinner and discusses the assets and liabilities of a traditionalist culture vs. a materialistic liberal culture? The masses, for the most part, don’t think in the abstract. Surely I don’t need to tell you that. The masses are directed and told what to do by the powers that be: politicians, schools, and most importantly, the media. (The beautiful thing about the media is that it doesn’t have to tell anyone anything directly: it merely shows them what to do: interracial relationships, homosexual acceptance, etc.)

Posted by Lawrence Auster at May 30, 2011 12:27 PM | Send