Protesters’ power grows
(CORRECTION, Oct. 16, 1 p.m.: I thought I had heard in the media that Brookfield Properties had willingly allowed the protesters to stay from the beginning, and that is what I said in the original posting of this entry late last night. But that was not correct. Rather, Brookfield wanted them to leave from the beginning. As Wikipedia reports, “The park, formerly called Liberty Plaza Park, was created in 1968 by United States Steel in return for a height bonus for its adjacent headquarters at the time of its construction. That building is now known as One Liberty Plaza.” Evidently when Brookfield acquired the property it inherited the duty to keep the park open 24 hours a day, and the protesters’ occupation of the park was protected under that rule. So when Brookfield, weeks ago, requested the city to remove the protesters, police commissioner Raymond Kelly replied that the protesters were within their rights and could not be removed. If this is correct (and I will check it out further today), there does not appear to be any way that the protesters can ever be removed. Only winter—not the City of New York—will remove them. I am deleting the original two paragraphs of this entry which incorrectly stated that Brookfield could have had the protesters removed but declined to do so.) (FURTHER UPDATE AND CLARIFICATION, Oct. 16, 4:30 p.m.: While Brookfield, as Commissioner Kelly said on September 28, could not simply bar the protesters from the park, it did have control over the conditions on which the protesters could use the park, and thus had and has the effective authority to end the 24/7 occupation, an authority which, unfortunately, it has so far chosen not to exercise. See later entries here, here, and here, which together provide sufficient factual and legal background to understand the situation.) The October 15 New York Post reports:
Wall Street protesters declare ‘victory,’ vow to continue Posted by Lawrence Auster at October 16, 2011 01:08 AM | Send Email entry |