Is VFR becoming a one-issue blog?

Today, as for the last few months, and not through any deliberate choice or preference on my part, VFR continues to be dominated by one issue: black on white violence. Why?

I’ve addressed the question previously, and there are many more things that could be said about it. But for the moment I will repeat, slightly edited, something I’ve said before:

Nonwhite violence against whites is the ultimate concretization of white America’s inclusion of and surrender to nonwhite and non-Western peoples. It is where the rubber meets the road on the path to national suicide.

- end of initial entry -

Glen T. writes:

Somebody has to do it in an articulate manner.

Aditya B. writes:

I, for one, applaud your painstaking documentation of the Black Intifada. Future generations of Chinese researchers will find a treasure trove in your blog that will enable them to understand the “root causes” of American downfall.

David B. writes:

The answer to this question is that the MSM and liberals in general called it when they went full bore on the Trayvon Martin Affair.

LA replies:

What do you mean “called it”?

David B. replies:

“Called it” means “started it.” It’s what a Tennessean would say. If someone provokes a fight and you knock him down and he whines about it, you tell him, “You called it.”

The MSM started it by claiming blacks are being “profiled” and killed all over the country “because of their race.”

The MSM and liberals “called it.” You are answering them by making entries about the unending black on white crimes taking place while the MSM wails about Trayvon Martin and lynches George Zimmerman.

Posted by Lawrence Auster at May 22, 2012 05:33 PM | Send