Dark Knight director describes his movies as innocent and joyful, and the copy-cat massacre inspired by his movies “senseless”
Christopher Nolan, director of the Dark Knight series, has released this statement about the massacre in Colorado (note that alone of all bloggers, journalists, and politicians in America, I call it a massacre, not a “tragedy,” a word that conveys the meaning of an unfortunate act, not an evil act):
Speaking on behalf of the cast and crew of “The Dark Knight Rises,” I would like to express our profound sorrow at the senseless tragedy that has befallen the entire Aurora community. I would not presume to know anything about the victims of the shooting but that they were there last night to watch a movie. I believe movies are one of the great American art forms and the shared experience of watching a story unfold on screen is an important and joyful pastime. The movie theater is my home, and the idea that someone would violate that innocent and hopeful place in such an unbearably savage way is devastating to me.Nolan, serving as his own good cop against his own bad cop, is not believable. He assaults his mass audience with staggering levels of cinematic sadism, intensifying today’s anti-culture in which superviolence and a crushingly ominous sense of existence are the norm, and then turns around and claims that his movies are “innocent,” “joyful,” and “hopeful.” Yesterday I quoted a description of the pornographic level of violence in Nolan’s 2008 movie, The Dark Knight. Here is a review of the new movie, The Dark Knight Rises, by Joe Morgenstern at the Wall Street Journal:
… And feeling good about life is not what Christian Bale’s Batman wants. This third—and, the director insists, final—installment of Mr. Nolan’s series makes you feel thoroughly miserable about life. It’s spectacular, to be sure, but also remarkable for its all-encompassing gloom. No movie has ever administered more punishment, to its hero or its audience, in the name of mainstream entertainment….And now see this, from the AP:
Shooting suspect James Holmes called a loner who emulated the Joker; his mother says, ‘You have the right person’
I think Nolan was speaking generally about the pastime of watching and enjoying movies at a theater. And you know how libs love to wax starry-eyed and eloquent about “shared experiences” (never mind exactly what the shared experience is). But in other interviews he’s made it clear that his own movies are dark, heavy, gloomy, etc. That being said, I agree that it’s amusing for him to appear TOTALLY oblivious to the irony of the whole thing. Just how “joyful” of an experience does he expect the audience to have watching a Dark Knight movie? Ugh.LA replies:
True, he doesn’t literally say, “My Dark Knight movies are innocent and joyful.” But he does unquestionably imply the same, since he says that people, including the people in the audience in Aurora, Colorado, go to movie theaters for an innocent and joyful experience, and that this innocence and joyfulness were senselessly violated by the “tragedy.”LA adds:
But the connection is more definite than what I just said. Nolan said: “The movie theater is my home, and the idea that someone would violate that innocent and hopeful place in such an unbearably savage way is devastating to me.” So it was both movie theaters generically and the specific movie theater where the attack took place that he describes as innocent and joyful. If the movie theater where the attack took place was innocent and joyful, then ipso facto the movie that was playing in that theater when the attack took place was innocent and joyful.Paul K. writes:
The image of the insane shooter, with hair dyed red, dressed in body armor, wearing a gas mask, and sadistically gunning down helpless men, women, and children in a theater as a violent movie plays on the screen above them sounds exactly like a scene from one of Christopher Nolan’s Batman movies. If Nolan had written and directed that scene, he would have proudly used it in his movie. It is truly “dark.”LA replies:
Right. So even as the Batman movies invoke extremely disturbing hyper-violence, in liberal manner they prohibit the supposedly moral hero from using deadly force to protect the innocent. So where is the great moral medicine that some VFR readers have claimed they find in these movies? (See the pro-Batman comments by Ben S. and Roland D. in this thread.) Posted by Lawrence Auster at July 21, 2012 12:48 PM | Send Email entry |