How we have lost America and put ourselves under the power of leftists, aliens, and parasites who intend our harm

Instead of posting something new this morning, I will re-post the following entry from November 2, which says it all:

Why this election is very bad news, no matter who wins

The fact that such a failed, irresponsible, unworthy, lying, leftist, anti-American president is in such a tight race against such a plausible and competent opponent, instead of facing the certainty of a Carter-type repudiation by the electorate, is a very sobering indicator of the state of our country. It confirms the view, held by some on the right, that America has already been transformed into a different country, a country in which blacks, Hispanic and other nonwhite immigrants, single women, and alienated white leftists—constituencies that hardly existed or were largely insignificant fifty years ago—now exercise virtual control over our politics and assure the county’s ever more leftward course. Therefore, even if the Republicans manage to pull out a victory this time, and in office slow down the country’s leftist march somewhat, and in particular stop the imminent catastrophe of Obamacare, all of which I very much hope happens, America in the long run is still lost. Our future is to be a country ruled by a coalition of nonwhite parasites and white leftist scum.

* * *

And will the neoconservatives, mainstream conservatives, and Republican politicians, who cheered and supported the mass Hispanic immigration that made the key difference in assuring America’s future as a leftist country, and called critics of this suicidal policy racists, ever admit their responsibility for what has happened?

[end of Nov. 2 entry]

I notice that at Lucianne.com this morning (in a thread responding to Charles Krauthammer’s amazing yet predictable statement last night on Fox that the future looks bright for the GOP), many commenters are pointing to the changed demographics and the browning of America as the cause of the loss of the country. However, they still identify the problem only as illegal immigration, as though the country had not been browned by the far larger legal immigration. For example, this comment:

Reply 4 - Posted by: Not your typical New Yorker, 11/7/2012 7:07:36 AM

The die is cast, the takers outnumber the earners and with the flood of illegal aliens the browning of America continues to accelerate and they will only want and demand more.

This will not stop any time soon it’s the new normal.

The far lefts 50 year plan came to fruition last night.

Now in this presidential term 3 Supreme court justices will reach the age of 80 years old, their replacements will cement the course of this country for many decades to come.

America is lost.

Remarkably, even though the commenter goes so far as to use the racial term, “the browning of America,” he still attributes this phenomenon to illegal immigration, thus softening and distracting from the purely racial component of the word “browning.” Mainstream conservatives remain incapable of criticizing the mass legal Third-World immigration that we have been receiving since 1965, because then they would be saying outright, without any cavils or qualifications, that the race of the immigrants is itself the problem, not their illegality.

- end of initial entry -

Kathlene M. writes:

The left isn’t even hiding it anymore. The headline below is from the SF Chronicle. On the next page, they admitted that the new demographics helped Obama get reelected.

Obama re-elected by shifting America

New voter landscape gives president four more years.

Washington—

A demographic tidal wave became a Democratic tidal wave as President Obama won a tight but decisive re-election victory Tuesday with the help of record-breaking support from Hispanic voters, massive turnout from African Americans and continuing enthusiasm from young Americans.

Also, more bad news for California: a super majority of Democrats were elected to the legislature. They have the power to do anything now. Republicans are now “irrelevant in Sacramento,” declares the SF Chronicle online.

LA replies:

Of course they’re not hiding it. Liberal columnists are everywhere declaring that the GOP is not viable in the demographically transformed America, and therefore that the GOP must change—in particular surrender to the Democrats on illegal immigration and amnesty—to remain viable. Which is of course absurd, since the Republicans will never be as attractive to the Hispanics as the Democrats. So basically it’s a call for the Republicans to surrender, period.

Bob A. writes:

Your November 2 entry that you quote at the beginning may be one of the most succinct summations of our plight I’ve yet to come across.

Kind of along the lines of the “confederacy of fools” quote:

“The danger to America is not Barack Obama, but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency. It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools, such as those who made him their president.”

I originally thought this election would be our swan song as a European people. Instead, it was our death rattle.

We are now tasked to protect our families. Each and every one of us, members of the tiny remnant, shall become tiny islands of sanity from which shall emanate concentrically to our families, kith and kin the knowledge we hold and know to be true.

LA replies:

Thanks.

Who wrote that “confederacy of fools” passage?

Also, I don’t agree with it. It implies that the problem is “foolishness” in the electorate that could possibly be remedied. But the problem is the transformation of the electorate by nonwhites and white leftist parasites. Nonwhites will vote for an Obama, no matter what. Their support for Obama cannot be remedied. So the “confederacy of fools” quotation is all wrong. In fact it’s typical conservatism in that it doesn’t face the reality of race.

Posted by Lawrence Auster at November 07, 2012 09:17 AM | Send